To: Former Proud Canadian
Foreign products crossing the border into another country, a distinction without a difference. Is what you are making. And the concept of a foreign company getting the rights of eminent domain, I do not think that is in the Constitution.
25 posted on
12/13/2011 6:09:59 AM PST by
org.whodat
(Just another heartless American, hated by "AMNESTY" Newt, Willard, Perry and his fellow supporters)
To: org.whodat
Not a distinction without a difference.
Hey, I understand you are against the pipeline. That's ok, but your real argument is not eminent domain.
43 posted on
12/13/2011 7:25:44 AM PST by
Former Proud Canadian
(Obamanomics-We don't need your stinking tar sands oil, or the jobs that go with it.)
To: org.whodat; Former Proud Canadian
And the concept of a foreign company getting the rights of eminent domain, I do not think that is in the Constitution. I expect it would be done with separate companies owning the pipeline on either side of the border. Similar to Alliance Pipeline, and others.
The Alliance Pipeline (NW Canada to Chicago) shows:
- Alliance Pipeline Limited Partnership ("Alliance Canada") owns the Canadian portion of the Alliance Pipeline system.
- Alliance Pipeline L.P. ("Alliance USA") owns the U.S. portion of the Alliance Pipeline system.
52 posted on
12/13/2011 11:40:54 AM PST by
esarlls3
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson