Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kevkrom

“”I find it highly unlikely that the intent was to bar patients from receiving (wanted) religious texts and other items from their friends and families, but rather to bar visitors from proselytizing to other patients during their visits.””

Good grief! And you don’t think an experienced military offficer would have been able to write exactly that if that’s what was meant?


14 posted on 12/13/2011 8:49:20 AM PST by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Thank You Rush; kevkrom; Kaslin
".....rather to bar visitors from proselytizing to other patients during their visits."

Oh, God, we can't have visitors proselytizing ... why, first thing you know, they'll be bringing bullhorns in here ......

Meanwhile, tonight's movie in the hospital rec center is Bowling for Columbine. Tomorrow night, on the weekly double feature, The Devil's Rejects and Saw III.

17 posted on 12/14/2011 4:14:31 AM PST by lentulusgracchus (Concealed carry is a pro-life position.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson