Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: samantha
Your entire post sounds like sour grapes...  Well okay.  Sounds like history to me.

...and is loaded with misinformation.  Misinformation?  Hmm...

What has happened to you?  Nothing much.  I came here and expressed my thoughts on a thread just like you are.

JD was a horrible, stinky candidate, and she backed Mccain before JD even put his hat in the ring.  Hayworth Declares 01/22/2010 Palin Announces Plans to campaign for McCain 01/20/2010

She made her announcment two days before J.D. Hayworth announced his intent to run for McCain's senate seat.  Speculation prior to that had made it crystal clear he was heavily contemplating a run.  For a woman who led her followers on until October 2011, until she quietly announced she wasn't going to run, it sure seems like she could have been a bit more patient in January 2010.


When are you people going to get a grip and stop blaming SP for JD being a $hitty candidate.  There are a number of aspects of this situation, that lead me to think Arizona McCain supporters are a classic case of living in denial.  McCain had been a treacherous traitor to Conservatism for decades.  His record is the worst I've ever seen, for someone claiming to be supportive of Conservative principles.  Take a look a this sordid list of McCain's history.  I believe there are close to 200 negatives (perhaps only 100, I haven't looked at it in a while) listed, covering most of McCain's life.  LINK

At the most, I have seen perhaps three or four bad things Hayworth has been charged with doing.  None of it even comes close to the treachery I documented about McCain.  His dealings with Soros, Kennedy, John and Teressa Kerry, Feingold, the Tides Foundation... these are the major players of the Left, almost the backbone of socialism and anti-American activity in the United States.  Soros alone funds countless anti-American efforts in the U.S.  John McCain and his Soros, Teressa Heinz Kerry, Tides Foundation backed organization become one of them.  His top campaign staff were paid six figure salaries in this organization.  You see, if McCain had won in 2008, Soros would still have had one of his own in the White House.  Now he's back in the Senate of the United States instead.

If he had been the candidate in AZ instead of Mccain that seat would have been a DemocRAT seat pickup.  Everyone knows that Mccain is a prostitute, but this was AZ.  John McCain out spent Hayworth by ten or twenty to one.  Are those the actions of a man who knew he had it in the bag?  Airing supportive spots by Palin for over five months on the main talk radio stations of Arizona, does that sound like a guy who thought he was a shoe-in?  There is absolutely no guarantee whatsoever that the Arizona McCain seat would have gone over to the Democrats.  The only sure way would have been if the Republican party, McCain's team, and all the people pulling for McCain in the state, had stayed home on election day.  Evidently that's what you're telling me you would have done.

SP served over 2 1/2 years as Governor. Why are you lying?  Palin was sworn in as Governor on December 4th, 2006.  LINK  Palin accepted the Vice Presidential slot to run with John McCain around the First of September 2008.  That is 21 months after she was sworn in.  I'm not certain she deserves credit for being an active governor during September through December of 2008, although you can tack on another six months in 2009.  It is reasoned to state that Palin actively served at least 27 months.  That is at a minimum nine months more than I gave her credit for, and it's reasoned to bring it up. Resignation July 3, 2009.  LINK  I know that some of you folks think her serving for 27 months is quite a feather in her cap, but for many of us it really isn't.  We see it as a failed term in office.

How long do you think RR’s term as Governor of California would have been had he won the GOP Presidential nomination,then the General Election the first time he ran? By the time he would have been sworn in as President he would have been Governor of California 2 years.  What I find rather comforting, is watching you folks try to dig up something you think will compare with Palin favorably.  Reagan served two full terms as Governor of California.  He ran for President of the United States.  He did not run as the bottom half of a presidential ticket then resign six months later.

You need to pick a decent candidate and stop trying to beat up on someone because you are pissed at the really crappy field. Stop blaming SP, look in the mirror.   Let me explain something for you.  Palin's most shallow thoughts have been regurgitated on this forum since September 2008.  It has been over three years since she ran with McCain.  She does not hold office.  She is not respected by McCain.  He has consistently used and abused her.  I have not found this to be particularly flattering to her. Frankly, it angers me on her behalf to tell the truth.  I have bit my lip on this forum a thousand times, if I've bit it once, rather than enter threads and voice my opinion regarding Palin.  We're entering 2012, Palin has finally decided she won't run, and it's really too bad that it bothers you that some of us have had it up to here with her, but that is a fact of life.

You didn't want us being frank about her in 2009.  You didn't want us being frank about her in 2010.  You don't like us being frank about her in 2011 either.  At some point you folks are going to have to come to terms with the reality that quite a few of us are sick to death of hearing Palin praised non-stop as if she were some master of the universe.  She isn't. 

Some of us would merely like that reality to be acknowledged.  I don't give a rats ass what she says.  I don't care who she endorses.  If she can endorse someone like John McCain, she's worthless as a person devining who should get Conservative support.  If she's going to tell the Tea Party that John McCain is one of them, then she's doing more harm than good.

I couldn't care less if you agree with me or not.

189 posted on 12/13/2011 11:47:21 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Why back in '88, Conservatives backed Gore in Texas. What Reagan revolution? What laegacy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne

Well said;)


199 posted on 12/14/2011 5:18:53 AM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

To: DoughtyOne
I guess you cannot see the forest for the trees. You rearrange dates,facts,records to suit your own newly tainted ideas,and bias. I think you could rearrange the deck chairs on the Titanic,then go down with it still yammering, “she only served 8 months, and JD was perfect,and if she had not interferred he would have won in a landslide”.

I will say it again, something happened to you, I do not remember this really different behavior before.

248 posted on 12/14/2011 7:36:05 PM PST by samantha ( Sarah Palin TEAple leader to save America. Herman Cain & Santorum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson