Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tea-party leader shocked by arrest on gun charges(NY)
wnd.com ^ | 15 December, 2011 | Chelsea Schilling

Posted on 12/16/2011 6:14:05 AM PST by marktwain

Mark Meckler, co-founder of Tea Party Patriots, one of the largest and most prominent tea-party groups, was arrested today at New York City's LaGuardia Airport on a gun charge – despite showing police his pistol permit and explaining that the weapon is registered in California.

"Mark Meckler, an attorney and national coordinator for Tea Party Patriots, who holds a concealed-carry permit from the state of California, today was charged with a firearms violation at LaGuardia Airport in New York City," said Brian Stapleton, Meckler's lawyer, in a statement.

"While in temporary transit through the state of New York in possession of an unloaded, lawful firearm that was locked in a (Transportation Security Administration)-approved safe, he legally declared his possession of the firearm in his checked baggage at the ticket counter as required by law and in a manner approved by TSA and the airline, yet was arrested by port authority for said possession," Stapleton said.

According to the Associated Press, Queens prosecutors say Meckler was taken into custody at about 5:20 a.m. today after he attempted to check in for his Delta flight and presented a box containing a Glock 27 pistol and 19 cartridges of ammunition. Meckler told authorities he carries the gun for protection because he receives threats.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: airport; arrest; banglist; checkedgun; gunrights; harassment; ny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
New York and New Jersey are notorious for ignoring federal law and harrassing travelers in this way.

Another reason to pass federal legislation requiring states to recognize other states permits and uphold the Second Amendment.

1 posted on 12/16/2011 6:14:15 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

I thought that this isn’t allowed for the State authorities to harass someone in temporary transit. I thought a bill got passed that mandates the States go HANDS OFF on this.


2 posted on 12/16/2011 6:18:37 AM PST by Lazamataz (That's all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Mark is lucky this happened now.

In a couple of months this type of thing will land him in Gitmo without a trial.

3 posted on 12/16/2011 6:18:45 AM PST by LoveUSA (God employs Man's strength; Satan exploits Man's weakness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

I thought so. FOPA prevents this behavior, to wit:

FEDERAL LAW ON TRANSPORTATION
OF FIREARMS

A provision of the federal law known as the Firearms Owners` Protection Act, or FOPA, protects those who are transporting firearms for lawful purposes from local restrictions which would otherwise prohibit passage.

Under FOPA, notwithstanding any state or local law, a person is entitled to transport a firearm from any place where he or she may lawfully possess and carry such firearm to any other place where he or she may lawfully possess and carry it, if the firearm is unloaded and locked out of reach. In vehicles without a trunk, the unloaded firearm must be in a locked container other than the glove compartment or console. Ammunition that is either locked out of reach in the trunk or in a locked container other than the glove compartment or console is also covered.
Travelers should be aware that some state and local governments treat this federal provision as an “affirmative defense” that may only be raised after an arrest. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has also recently held that FOPA`s protections only apply while the firearm is not readily accessible to the traveler, and that a firearm is readily accessible during a hotel stay.

While this decision is only binding in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware and the U.S. Virgin Islands, all travelers in areas with restrictive laws would be well advised to have copies of any applicable firearm licenses or permits, as well as copies or printouts from the relevant jurisdictions` official publications or websites documenting pertinent provisions of law (including FOPA itself) or reciprocity information. In the event of an unexpected or extended delay, travelers should make every effort not to handle any luggage containing firearms unnecessarily and to secure it in a location where they do not have ready access to it.


4 posted on 12/16/2011 6:20:30 AM PST by Lazamataz (That's all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Sounds like another case of “punishment by process”. He is being punished by the Bloomberg anti-gun goons because he is an out spoken 2nd amendment advocate even though he committed no crime. After he misses his flight and spends a few hours in jail, he will be freed and the authorities will claim it was all a “misunderstanding”.
5 posted on 12/16/2011 6:28:35 AM PST by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

What. a. crock. of. sheet.


6 posted on 12/16/2011 6:29:40 AM PST by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Actually it's New York City that's got a bug up it's collective keister about handguns. I wanted to take my 9mm up to Maine while visiting a Friend so we could go shooting, but changed my mind when I read on the net that your not allowed to even drive through NYC with a handgun regardless of how you secure it.
7 posted on 12/16/2011 6:32:42 AM PST by Falcon4.0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Kind of like being arrested for “disturbing the peace” if you open carry in an open carry state.


8 posted on 12/16/2011 6:34:48 AM PST by IamConservative ("The ability to speak eloquently is not to be confused with having something to say." - MP Hart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

As I understand this story, he declared when checking the luggage at the ticket counter that it contained the gun and ammunition (so he would have had no opportunity to use it on anyone while on the plane). Yet he’s being charged with a crime that could carry a sentence of 15 years in prison? That sounds outrageous.


9 posted on 12/16/2011 6:35:05 AM PST by GJones2 (Declared firearm in luggage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
It wasw in a locked box in his checked baggage! They treated him as if he had it strapped on under his jacket, loaded and ready to go.

I wonder if there's someway he can sue them for ignoring the law.....I suppose not *sigh*

I wish there was a way to make them pay so much they wouldn't pull this crap again!

10 posted on 12/16/2011 6:35:44 AM PST by CAluvdubya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

I am confused, Laz...

I don’t see anythig in this story to hit


11 posted on 12/16/2011 6:36:15 AM PST by Mr. K (Physically unable to profreed <--- oops, see?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

I live here. This guy is in trouble.


12 posted on 12/16/2011 6:37:33 AM PST by GlockThe Vote (The Obama Adminstration: 2nd wave of attacks on America after 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Travelers should be aware that some state and local governments treat this federal provision as an “affirmative defense” that may only be raised after an arrest.

This is the key to NY's ability to harrass.

Of course the charges will eventually be dropped, but the time, effort and money spent doing so can still be significant.

13 posted on 12/16/2011 6:37:45 AM PST by sonofagun (Some think my cynicism grows with age. I like to think of it as wisdom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Part you missed is this:

Special Advisory for New York and New Jersey Airports: Despite federal law that protects travelers, authorities at JFK, La Guardia, Newark and Albany airports have been known to enforce state and local firearms laws against airline travelers who are merely passing through the jurisdiction. In some cases, even persons traveling in full compliance with federal law have been arrested or threatened with arrest. As noted above in the section entitled “Federal Law on the Transportation of Firearms,” FOPA`s protections have been substantially narrowed by court decisions, and persons traveling with firearms may want to avoid New York and New Jersey or make arrangements to ship their firearms to their destination, rather than bringing them through these jurisdictions.


14 posted on 12/16/2011 6:37:49 AM PST by RoadieFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
New York (but not NJ) takes the view, that, "fine, there is a Federal law. You can use that as a defense at your trial".

As far as I know, NY is the only state that openly defies the intent of the Federal law in this way.

15 posted on 12/16/2011 6:38:39 AM PST by Jim Noble (To live peacefully with credit-based consumption and fiat money, men would have to be angels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Mark Meckler, co-founder of Tea Party Patriots, one of the largest and most prominent tea-party groups, was arrested today at New York City's LaGuardia Airport on a gun charge – despite showing police his pistol permit and explaining that the weapon is registered in California.

Next stop GITMO!

16 posted on 12/16/2011 6:40:53 AM PST by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LoveUSA

You are correct, that’s where the “detention” bill is aimed, at you, me, us.


17 posted on 12/16/2011 6:42:12 AM PST by izzatzo ( Anybody but Obamney and Huntsman--Bachmann/???, 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
The real question is how many lawsuits the New York Port Authority is going to have to lose, before they stop this shit?
18 posted on 12/16/2011 6:44:33 AM PST by jdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble; RoadieFan; sonofagun
Well, this is actually kind of neat.

On one hand, we have the negative of New York simply outright defying Federal Law.

On the other hand, we have the positive of precendent when many other states simply outright defy Obamacare.

Mixed blessing, I guess.

19 posted on 12/16/2011 6:44:58 AM PST by Lazamataz (That's all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: marktwain; Joe Brower

I don’t see how we can remain in a union with states that prefer tyranny.


20 posted on 12/16/2011 6:46:42 AM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson