Posted on 12/19/2011 11:09:43 AM PST by Free ThinkerNY
This is one gigantic fail, and one child who was 14 at the time of the assault is paying the price for his entire community’s failure, certainly including the boneheads who urged him to plead guilty and made no defense.
Then : A guy walks up to a girl in a bar and tells her what he’d like to do to her. She throws a drink in his face. The bartender has the Bouncer toss him. The cop outside arrests him for disorderly conduct.
Now : A Gay guy walks up to a guy in a bar and tells him what he’d like to do to him. He throws a drink in his face. The bartender has the bouncer toss him. The cop outside arrests the Bouncer, bartender and the straight guy. The bar is closed until all employees undergo Sensitivity Training and start have Gay Pride Nights.
“How does a 14 yo boy handle sexual advances in school, in front of others?”
I’m not sure, but what I do know that many if not most 14-18 year old girls in high school somehow figure out how to handle sexual advances from classmates and they do not resort to walking into a classroom and murdering the guy who made the sexual advances.””
I don’t think the kid was justified in killing this pervert who should have been in treatment, but there is a very big difference between the natural reaction to these deviants and normal sexual attractions in a DIMORPHIC species. The normal male is repulsed by other males who seek to “breed” with “breeders (the homo name for normal). Male homosexuals are in effect breeders too—they breed and vector infectious disease agents and threaten public health at a huge and unneccessary cost.
Murder is murder.
Some would suggest this is a self-defense issue. Imagine if the victim of the queer was a young girl who was the victim of a young man. Would the sentence the girl received be 21 years? Would the boys that Mr. Sandusky bullied be justified in defending themselves with deadly force?
God's standards are that homosexual behavior is an abomination and those who partake in it should be killed. Brandon McInerney would be seen as just doing what he was supposed to be doing. Keeping perversion from spreading by removing the carrier.
Strongly disagree. There is only one victim here, and he's being wrongly sent to jail after defending himself from a sexual predator. The perp got offed
That’s fine...I’m no pro-homo advocate, but I believe the kid that was killed was also victimized by the militant lesbian school principal, the teacher, and the school administration.
They failed him by essentially by not getting him counseling, enforcing the rules of conduct, allowing himi to dress in a distracting manner, behave in a manner that was disruptive and offensive, etc.
They not only tolerated his behavior, they endorsed it. The homo took what they gave him and he paid for it with his life.
The “adults” should be on trial as I believe they are conspirators in all of this. They conspired to force homosexuality upon innocent children, and 2 lives and 2 families are destroyed.
Yet, the real perps go right back to their places of employment, the school.
“God’s standards are that homosexual behavior is an abomination and those who partake in it should be killed. Brandon McInerney would be seen as just doing what he was supposed to be doing.”
If you feel that strongly, you should emulate Brandon’s actions. But, I imagine that you will not and thus do not actually believe what you have posted.
And hopefully, over the next 21 years, Brandon will learn to better deal with such advances.
I’d agree with that.
If I, or someone I love, is attacked by a sexual predator as Brandon was, I will respond with deadly force. (Got to love the castle doctrine and the right of self defense)
Can you please cite a source that confirms that Brandon was attacked in the schoolhouse?
Here are the deeds that Lawrence King did. In 1 incident Lawrence King masturbated (touched himself as said on 20/20) in front of the boy who killed him. Lawrence King repeatedly proposed to other boys in the bathroom lockerroom. Any1 who sees nothing wrong with Lawrence King’s anti-social conduct has something wrong with them. It wouldn’t surprise me if in the future, they’d have suggested that Lawrence King be surgically maimed to become a fake woman like they did to Chastity Bono. Sex changes must be abolished & transexuals are worse than the homos.
Don’t repeat the rerun about teen boys harassing girls. If a man had sexually harassed a woman after which the woman bashed or killed him, it wouldn’t surprise me if many of Lawrence King’s sympathisers would talk of how the man asked for it. Cases where a woman has accused a man of rape, the woman’s friends bashed or killed the man & it was later proven the man was innocent. That could’ve happened in the Duke case where Crystal Gail Mangum falsely accused the men & CG Mangum since been convicted of child abuse & currently facing murder trial for killing boyfriend. In Italy, there was a case where a teen girl said that 2 Gypsy men raped her & it resulted in riots against a Gypsy neighborhood. Well, after this riot, the teen girl admitted she lied about being raped because she didn’t want her parents to know she had sex.
So if a gay is going to be anti-social as Lawrence King was, I too would vote for Manslaughter & agree with the 7 jurors who saw it as manslaughter. I’m against starting fights, but if a gay is going to be anti-social, such as harass a man or commit assault&battery, then a man must use just force to end the abuse though not as it happened to Lawrence King.
Lawrence King was already a little Larry Craig & Lawrence King was worsening. Had nothing happened, we don’t know how much worse Lawrence King could’ve been in 2018 when he is 25 or even in 2011 when he is 18. It’s possible that Lawrence King could’ve become a future sex offender such as commit homosexual rapes on others in the bathroom. But with Lawrence King dead, we don’t have to worry about it. Not all murders are the same. If killing Lawrence King saved some1 from becoming Lawrence King’s future homosexual rape victim, then Lawrence King’s killing is the lesser of 2 evils. This case shouldn’t have been prosecuted as 1st Degree, it should’ve been prosecuted as 2nd Degree & then have a jury decide if it’s 2nd Degree or Manslaughter. & I believe it’s Manslaughter.
Finally, you can’t predict how Brandon McInerney will be treated in prison & it’s evil to wish harm on him. I believe the prison staff & many prisoners will support Brandon McInerney & sympathize with him because he killed some1 who was victimising him.
Added comment. Brandon McInerney had to do something to end Lawrence King’s abuse. To say that he accept Lawrence King masturbating in front of him & repeatedly proposing to him as others have said on different blogs is evil. No, he shouldn’t have shot & killed him but when things were done legally such as students complaining to teacher Jill Ekman after Lawrence King harassed them in the bathroom, the lesbian vice principal Joy Epstein overrode the teacher & refused to expel Lawrence King. In fact, Lawrence King laughed @ teacher Jill Ekman by saying he liked to make the boys squirm because he knew that the viceprinicpal would override the teacher. The prosecutor harassed teacher Jill Ekman because Jill Ekman told the facts of Lawrence King’s anti-social behaviour.
But if I’m being abused & I do nothing to end the abuse, then maybe I deserve the abuse. I mean if a man gets slapped by his wife (women also commit domestic violence) but he just takes his wife’s battery & not call the cops, then if his wife gets more violent or even kills him, there are people who’d say that maybe the man deserved it because he just took the abuse. That’s why Brandon McInerney needed to end Lawrence King’s abuse & not take it because if nothing had been done, we don’t know how much worse Lawrence King could’ve become in the future. Just something to consider. Merry Christmas.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.