The law does not require proof of immediate impact but only a showing of a "serious risk of institutionalization," Judge William Fletcher said in the majority opinion, citing arguments submitted by the Obama administration's Justice Department.Fletcher, William A.
Yeah, but they’re smarter than the rest of the world combined. Judicial arrogance.
Any lefty headline that contains the words....could....may..or might....its garbage...if they use the words ....has.....that means it might be factual.
So are the judges going to make up the difference that the state can’t pay?
How in the hell does this become a federal issue?
the facts are that it USED TO BE that disabled and elderly lived with relatives who took care of them...fed them, washed them, etc....
now we have this huge govt monstrosity thinking it can make up that care by paying out billions and suddenly , the billions aren't there....
we'd better get back to the old days folks...blood is thicker than water....its going to be that WE take care of our families,in sickness and in health....not the govt...the govt couldn't care for a gerbil properly....