Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mitt Fears Newt
spectator.org ^ | 12/22/2011 | AARON GOLDSTEIN

Posted on 12/22/2011 3:20:04 PM PST by TBBT

In an interview with the AP while campaigning in New Hampshire today, Mitt Romney said he would not meet Newt Gingrich in a one on one debate "out of respect" for the other candidates in the GOP race. What a copout. Were Herman Cain, Rick Santorum and Jon Huntsman being disrespectful to Romney when they agreed to one on one debates with Gingrich? When it comes to Newt, I guess Mitt is content to hide behind his surrogates and third party attack ads. And here I thought Mitt wanted to earn the nomination. Well, if Mitt wants to earn my vote then he needs to debate Newt mano-a-mano. If he refuses to do so then I can only conclude that Mitt fears Newt. And well he should.

(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cowardromney; newt; pussyromney; romney; romneyafraid; romneyunderskirts
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
Sounds familiar... Like something I said earlier today...

It would be a good strategy for Newt to continue the challenge.

1 posted on 12/22/2011 3:20:05 PM PST by TBBT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TBBT

I am sure he will.


2 posted on 12/22/2011 3:22:00 PM PST by Psalm 144 (Voodoo Republicans: Don't read their lips - watch their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

Newt should give a preview of how he plans to force Obama into a debate. This is a good opportunity for him.


3 posted on 12/22/2011 3:23:23 PM PST by vmivol00
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

Romney is afraid Gingrich will nail him on the attack ads and smears. However, bet Gingrich gets him in the next debate on that very issue unless the moderators intervene. Hope Newt lets the world know Romney and Paul spent 9 MILLION dollars on attack ads in Iowa and points out the lies that were told by Mitts supporters.
GOOOOOOOOOOOO NEWT!


4 posted on 12/22/2011 3:24:49 PM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

Should fear him! Newt will destroy him and he will destroy the Teleprompter queen.


5 posted on 12/22/2011 3:33:00 PM PST by liberty or death
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

Gingrich will skewer the dolt. He had Romney spinning in circles the debate before last-in the last debate, Romney played it cute.

And we wonder who the hell did all that to Cain? Romney was in the shit right up to his eyes. Remember he played that cute also.


6 posted on 12/22/2011 3:33:57 PM PST by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

When I see Mitt Romney, I think of Pee-wee Herman.

It used to be Howdy Doody, but I don’t think Howdy was ever a coward.

Coward Romney will never show up for a fair fight.


7 posted on 12/22/2011 3:34:04 PM PST by Gator113 (~Just livin' life, my way~.. Newt/Palin-West-2012."got a lot swirling around in my head.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gator113

When I see Mitt Romney, I think of Pee-wee Herman
______________________________________________________________

“I know you are but who am I” Mitt’s big adventure.


8 posted on 12/22/2011 3:40:49 PM PST by sanjuanbob (Festina Lente)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sanjuanbob

LOL... It fits very well.


9 posted on 12/22/2011 3:42:18 PM PST by Gator113 (~Just livin' life, my way~.. Newt/Palin-West-2012."got a lot swirling around in my head.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

Newt is the worst choice next to Huntsman. Santorum is the best.

I don’t like Romney. I do like Santorum or Bachmann. Newt is not a conservative. He is a Pelosi Republican. Newt along with Huntsman is athe worst choice.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTjMjSXy30U
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=02HX5v5Thpk&feature=related

While in the House - Newt voted for:
1. Dept of Education - something communists supported.
2. Amnesty
3. Increased UN funding
4. Grabbing more land for Federal ownership filled with natural resources - something Marx also supported.
5. Voted for more foreign aid.
6. Voted for most favored nation trading status for China.
7. Federally funded loan guarantees for trade with China.
8. Voted for funding the NEA - including p**s Christ artwork
9. $1.2 billion in extra aid to the UN for peacekeeping.
10. $166 million in extra funding for the IRS.
11. Campaigned for and supported Nelson Rockefeller.
12. Got GATT/WTO voted in by allowing lame duck Congress to get it passed.
13. Repealed Glass-Steagall with Bill Clinton allowing banks to become securities firms with 40 to 1 leverage. This is how the banks blew up.

Newt and Clinton are both CFR members and did the NWO’s work back in the day. Their love fest in NH was pathetic.

“Conservatives” thinking Newt is one of them are as sad as his ex-wives.

Post the House
1.Newt campaigned for RINO Dede Scofazza who then endorsed the Democrat in NY state.
2.Newt made a commercial with Pelosi supporting the Global Warming fraud.
3.Newt came out in favor of amnesty


10 posted on 12/22/2011 3:47:18 PM PST by John360
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John360

What utter foolishness you tried to pawn off at Freerepublic! You really ought to know that two of Newt’s Three wives are supporting his run for the presidency. Troll along now ...


11 posted on 12/22/2011 3:52:56 PM PST by MHGinTN (Some, believing they cannot be deceived, it's impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: John360

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2815463/posts

Using Democrat talking points won’t help you get Romney elected.

So, who do you support? Or are you trolling here to just take Newt down for Romney? Sure looks that way.


12 posted on 12/22/2011 3:58:59 PM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: John360
Smells like Troll...........
13 posted on 12/22/2011 4:01:10 PM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP; All
Yeah, in our poster's illustrious 3 day posting life, he's played himself out like a broken record.

Mitt, is that you with more or less the exact same post over and over? You've posted the same thing on this thread and these:

Citizens United running Iowa ads featuring Gingrich

AP Interview: Romney says no to Gingrich debate

Romney sidesteps tax dispute; Gingrich dives in

“Newt Romney” and Crony Capitalism

Did Newt Gingrich Peak Too Early? CNN Poll Shows Him Fading

14 posted on 12/22/2011 4:12:53 PM PST by GreenAccord (Bacon Akbar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: John360

John 360
since DEC. 19, 2011

Where did he come from and why??


15 posted on 12/22/2011 4:31:08 PM PST by duffee (NEWT 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

“....I guess Mitt is content to hide behind his surrogates and third party attack ads.”

.
Mitt may not have anyone to debate, even if he won the republican nomination.

Some radio show host predicted yesterday that Obama may not want to debate anyone for the POTUS position.


16 posted on 12/22/2011 4:32:39 PM PST by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

It’s OK Mitt, I fear Newt too, as I fear all of the RINOs like you and Newt.


17 posted on 12/22/2011 4:42:50 PM PST by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (We be fooked.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT
I guess Mitt needs to "MAN UP."

YOu do remember using those words, don't you Mitt?

I guess you're only "man enough" to use surrogate organizations to smear Newt, but clearly you aren't "man enough" to debate Newt.

Hey, Mitt, you need to "MAN UP!"
18 posted on 12/22/2011 4:44:58 PM PST by Sudetenland (Anybody but Obama!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

Mitt disgusts me. No courage. No moral courage. No mano-a-mano courage.


19 posted on 12/22/2011 4:46:34 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John360

I love how you are being slammed as a troll. DU liberal will be the next slander. Now that Palin let us down, JimRob is looking for the least smelly turd in the manure pile and is coming up Gingrich.

Now all of the JimRob brown nosers are coming out singing high praises of NWO inside establishmentarian Gingrich.

This is laughable. Conservatives praising Gingrich as the next coming. Where were these clowns a year ago when Bachmann and Palin and Cain were all being trumpeted. The fact is, Gingrich is NOT a conservative and your list is valid and is far from trolling.

But now that it is obvious we aren’t going to get a conservative nominee, and it is down to Romney or some other RINO, some people here are trying to promote Gingrich as a conservative, which he is not.

You talk about Kabuki theater. Here it is in spades. The logic is twisted but the genesis is crystal clear.

Palin, Bachmann and Cain are shot down in flames. All of our conservative hopes are dead and gone. JimRob begins clutching at straws and comes up with Gingrich over Romney (understandable as my own test conclusions were that Obama agrees more with me than Romney does!@!!!!!!).

So now the JimRob brown nosers are out in force to kiss his ass, and everybody who doesn’t tow the line that the anointed Gingrich is to be worshipped, has to be a troll or liberal.

Bullcrap!

We conservatives have NO REPRESENTATION, NO VOICE in this election anymore. Gingrich is going to pick up right where Baby Bush left off.

We are beyond screwed. Gingrich. Romney. Perry. Who gives a flying crap. We are screwed and every conservative on this site knows that in his heart, even the new paraded of JimRob brown nosers picking up the popular “Gingrich is god” mantra.

For the good it will do me, there isn’t an ounce of difference between Romney and Gingrich. Romney would piss more a lot more often with his social liberalism, but at the end of the day, they are both big government pigs who will sell out to big business and screw the middle class and increase regulations while reducing our freedom.

If saying that makes you or I a troll, then I’m proud to be a troll.

Conservatives have no representation anymore. Period. Obama is a one-term wonder and we are going to be stuck with Romney or Perry or Gingrich. We are screwed either way. Just screwed.

I’m trying to belive in my heart of hearts that maybe Gingrich would nominate a Clarence Thomas or a Roberts to the supreme court, and if that is the difference between him and a Romney, then maybe that is worth looking into. Myself, I doubt their nominees would be very much different at all.

Either way, we are just screwed. Obama is a lame duck one-termer and the conservative we need to scale back Obamacare and shrink government is nowhere to be found.

We are just screwed. You didn’t say one false thing about Gingrich. Not one. The JimRob brown nosers can’t fight you on the facts, so all they have left is to call you naughty names, boo hoo.

I’m getting to the point where if Romney or Gingrich are the GOP nominee, I’m just writing in Palin’s name and the hell with it.


20 posted on 12/22/2011 5:06:20 PM PST by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (We be fooked.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson