To: nuconvert
Could one of you really smart Freepers tell us how “Moving a website to a local host” is going to protect the website from an outside attack? It would seem that if the website is on the internet, then it is available for an “attack.” What am I missing here?
3 posted on
12/23/2011 8:12:25 PM PST by
Ken522
To: Ken522
You are missing nothing. As a commenter above stated, this probably made them LESS secure.
Which is just fine by me...
4 posted on
12/23/2011 8:14:01 PM PST by
piytar
(The Obama Depression. Say it early, say it often. Why? Because it's TRUE.)
To: Ken522
Could one of you really smart Freepers tell us how “Moving a website to a local host” is going to protect the website from an outside attack? It would seem that if the website is on the internet, then it is available for an “attack.” What am I missing here? Not missing anything. If their 'local hosts' are connected to the outside then they can be hacked.
5 posted on
12/23/2011 8:14:42 PM PST by
ParityErr
(It's impossible to make anything foolproof because fools are so ingenious.)
To: Ken522
Lets see. Local security vs. paid security.
8 posted on
12/23/2011 9:17:14 PM PST by
Pikachu_Dad
(Impeach Sen Quinn)
To: Ken522
Lets see. Local security vs. paid security.
9 posted on
12/23/2011 9:17:14 PM PST by
Pikachu_Dad
(Impeach Sen Quinn)
To: Ken522
Lets see. Local security vs. paid security.
10 posted on
12/23/2011 9:17:22 PM PST by
Pikachu_Dad
(Impeach Sen Quinn)
To: Ken522
They figure any remote site is in the pockets of the US or Isreal. If you bring it in house, you know where it is and who has access. But it’s like bringing your cash home from the bank. You know where it is...but is it really more secure than a bank vault?
11 posted on
12/25/2011 5:01:37 AM PST by
Vermont Lt
(I just don't like anything about the President. And I don't think he's a nice guy.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson