[Tribune7]

I just have very little confidence that romney would work to reverse zero’s socialist policies at the EPA, healthcare, and as it pertains to overall spending.

Dittos to that.

But if Willard should scheme his way to the nomination -- and I don't think he will -- I will vote for him over 0.

This is one of those rare times where the devil we don't know is better than the one we do.

[grumpygresh]

Agree.

[lentulusgracchus]

But if Willard should scheme his way to the nomination -- and I don't think he will -- I will vote for him over 0.

If we get down to that, we've lost the election even if "we" win. It'll be back to Denny Hastert, Mark Foley, and bridges to nowhere if Romney gets in. He stands for nothing.

I listened to him on Charlie Rose the other night, and Charlie interrogated him on the issues. All I heard was a bunch of nothing.

Romney's m.o. is to make noises about "I don't like" this or that or "the way that other thing happened" -- but absolutely refuse to commit to a remedy or a principle. He is 100% opportunistic baloney, a tool for other agenda we will not be allowed to interrogate him about. By which I mean all the stuff that is off the table, like sovereignty, the liberty interest of the People, the structure of the Armed Forces.