Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JimSEA

? This, “Isolationists in the 1930’s tended to be anti Semitic.”

why single out one group. By definition wouldn’t isolationists be anti every group or nation but the USA?
Are you saying isolationists would not have to the aid of Ijews would have to the aid of muslims?

To be clear Paul’s position is abhorrent, but it is consistent to him.


16 posted on 12/27/2011 9:48:04 AM PST by RWGinger (Simpl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: RWGinger

I singled that group in the 1930’s out because Paul’s and Buchannan’s positions come from these isolationists. There seems to be nothing entirely new in the “something new and different” of the Paulists. Just as the OWS recycle the 60’s radicals who recycled the 30’s communists who, in turn, “discovered” the IWW and Bolsheviks.

Also, the 30’s isolationists favored the rise of the fascists in Europe. So, isolationism was often more, “don’t get in the way” than “don’t influence”.


61 posted on 12/27/2011 10:27:26 AM PST by JimSEA (The future ain't what it used to be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson