Posted on 12/28/2011 7:41:33 AM PST by Iron Munro
Can American civilization collapse? You bet. All others have. We don't need a Mayan calendar to foreshadow the end. Signs are everywhere, we just need a brain to process the onslaught of information.
Of the various cataclysms that 2012 may herald, the first significant one is the Dissolution of the American State.
In America, when we speak of "the state" we mean something like New Jersey. In Europe and elsewhere, it is the central government, including provincial and local governments. It is an entity or apparatus with a life of its own. For most of the history of the world, with very few exceptions, "the state" has been legitimized by gods and kings. As Louis XIV of France declared, "I am the State." Until the American Revolution, there was a wall of separation between government and its people.
Our American State is founded on the principle of "We the People" as the source of all legitimate authority. Its operation is exemplified by Lincoln's famous characterization of it in the Gettysburg Address: a government of, by and for the people. But who today believes our current government embodies these principles?
There is no government "of the people" because "We the People" can't afford to run for office. Candidates need personal fortunes or else most (but not all) will sell out to the special interests.
"For the people"? Only in a convoluted way. Almost 60 percent of all Americans (dependents included) get 100 percent of their income from government (federal, state and local): as workers, Social Security and SSI recipients, other pension beneficiaries and general assistance. The American State, as paymaster to so many people, has created a class of servants. Perhaps this is why the government has no fear to serve itself first. For example, Congress has its own retirement program (not Social Security) its own health benefits and other lifetime perks. The American State also spends billions and billions on programs for corporate and other special interests, thus assuring its survival.
Worse yet, our government is now a "house divided against itself." It is clearly dysfunctional. Elections are an excuse to sow seeds of hatred and discontent.
There is ubiquitous belief that government doesn't serve the public good, and there is an overwhelming lack of confidence in Congress.
Our state can save itself, but not its people. It cannot solve any of the complex problems we face, such as crushing debt, health care, educational reform, immigration policy, failing infrastructure, poverty and underemployment.
When the general population has no faith or stake in the state, it will collapse.
Given the seething discontent, two major political issues related to the 2012 presidential election will act as flash points signaling the reshaping and eventual demise of our current state. First is geo-politics, whereby a candidate can dominantly win urban populations in a select number of states and become president. Also, a candidate may win the popular vote and yet not be president. The second is the coming call for the elimination of the Electoral College. Where we go from there is an open question.
Many believe that we can replace our American State with a global system of government that can solve our problems. This would only make matters worse, making what is complex impossibly so. Consider government debt. For a shocking analysis of United States and world debt, go to www.usdebtclock.org. Despite what propagandists say, these liabilities can't be paid off.
The easiest way out of our debt is to destroy it and U.S. sovereignty by merging it into a world SuperState. After many trillions of wealth are destroyed by taxation, inflation and confiscation, and after much strife, a super-government run by a small number of elites will constitute a new state. There will be fewer liberties and fewer opportunities, but lots of gadgets, games and techno-diversions for all.
But wait. One thing has not been considered. America is still a government "BY THE PEOPLE." We do have the power to change things, to create an alternate future. The Tea Party has made some significant moves in electing "new" people, albeit from only one party. Occupy Wall Street, distrustful of both parties, may yet provide an impetus for the emergence of new leaders — perhaps even new parties.
What we most desperately need are different kind of leaders. Most current ones are living homages to a credo of Wealth, Power and Fame. We need servant-leaders, people who prioritize service first.
Such leaders prize humility, espouse a sense of community, of nurturing — even of healing. Potential leaders like this do exist among "We the People." Many more can be found/created.
All of this takes time, and in this crazy age, time is compressed. Now that we are on the downward slope, can "We the People" reverse momentum?
We have done it before and we have not yet perished from the face of the earth.
You're on the right track with that idea. The privilege of casting a ballot should rest on the following conditions:
1. Illiterate? No vote.
2. Non-citizen? No vote.
3. On the dole? No vote.
4. Acknowledged socialist or commmunist? No vote.
5. Muslim? No vote.
I'm sure that folks could come up with more than that, but it's a good start.
It's a phrase. You take it a bit too literally. Of course they made sacrifices and filled a very important role for our nation... but the point of the "landowner-only" voting rule is that only those who contribute to the budget should decide how it is allocated... otherwise, eventually, you get to the insane position we are now in.
Just as employees do not make executive decisions, because it is not their capital that is at stake. Yes, they work hard, yes, they have an interest in the success in the company... but that does not mean that they have decision-making powers for the corporation.
But, of course, using emotional appeals like yours (a favorite tactic by the Left), exceptions can get made for service.
I know lots of renters who contribute to the budget.
"But, of course, using emotional appeals like yours (a favorite tactic by the Left), exceptions can get made for service."
What's emotional about it? You seem to think that the only contributions that are made to the federal government are monetary. Human capital, those who have served, and continue to serve have contributed years of their lives, some of them, all of their lives, limbs, psyches, etc. to the exercise of our government's operations and policies. Apparently, if they rent an apartment, it's your opinion they should be disenfranchised.
Lots of steps toward disaster. I nominate April 8, 1913, the date the 17th Amendment was ratified affecting how senators are elected. When Congress did that, they diminished individual states' rights. Prior to that, elected leaders in the states selected their representatives to represent their state. After that, senators did not feel beholden to their state, and colluded with their peers in the senate to drive agendas that ruined our nation.
bttt
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.