Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wmfights; DManA; xzins
Apparently Bain Capital had an ownership interest in a bank that failed. I have no idea how Bain got anything based on this article.

For the life of me I cannot understand how or why the FDIC would bail out a bank or an investor in the bank. The FDIC exists solely for the purpose of protecting DEPOSITORS (not investors) to these institutions.

22 posted on 12/28/2011 12:16:00 PM PST by P-Marlowe (Stop Romney!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: P-Marlowe

God knows what powers to spend money any of the bureauracries have. Their books are so bad it is impossible to audit most of them.


23 posted on 12/28/2011 12:22:57 PM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: P-Marlowe; DManA; xzins
For the life of me I cannot understand how or why the FDIC would bail out a bank or an investor in the bank. The FDIC exists solely for the purpose of protecting DEPOSITORS (not investors) to these institutions.

I read the entire article trying to figure that out and didn't see an explanation. My only guess is they deposited funds up to the maximum allowable using friends and family as beneficiaries. You are right the FDIC is the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. They take a premium from member banks and pay out on insured deposits.

I don't see how an investor with an ownership interest in a bank has that investment insured.

24 posted on 12/28/2011 12:48:06 PM PST by wmfights (PERRY 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson