The crashingly obvious reason -- it should be crashingly obvious -- is that homosexuals have cabalized Media, especially reporting, ever since 1994, when they launched the big Philadelphia propaganda offensive to bear down the "'phobes" and "settle the issue" once and for all: homo good, het bad.
That was when both TIME and Newspeak put Matthew Shepard on their covers, and Jonathan Demme's self-admittedly propaganda-piece film Philadelphia came out, starring superheavyweights Denzel Washington and Tom Hanks. (Note: I've boycotted this film since its release and have never watched it, no matter how many times ION TV runs it, for precisely that reason.)
The huge majority of page-one editors at The New York Times are homosexual, and their chief political writer, Adam Nagourney, is openly homosexual, as was his predecessor. How gay does your shop have to be, when one 5-percenter is succeeded, in a marquee job, by another 5-percenter? The obvious answer is, heterosexuals are being systematically discriminated against, and gradually eased out completely, at The New York Times.
Based on editorial content, the Houston Chronicle has been gay since at least 2000.
Pinch Sulzberger was the NYT publisher who, when he came aboard in 1988, slammed the tiller hard over on reportage about homosexuality -- and then started discriminating against hets, too, as it now appears.
I didn’t know they have so thoroughly infiltrated the NYT.
Not that I’m surprised.
They’ve really become emboldened and aggressive since Lawrence vs. Texas.