Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Carry_Okie
I dunno. I visited Yellowstone and Grand Tetons this summer and they have done a pretty remarkable job of balancing the need for human amenity with the natural scenic beauty. Then again I saw a documentary on the original development of Yosemite when it was basically in private hands--pretty squalid outcome.

The simple fact about Natural Parklands is that most will be in the West, because that is where the open land is. Yellowstone is three times the size of Rhode Island--the scales in the East are just different.

We should be discriminating too in our alarm about "master plans." Yellowstone had a master plan approved in 1972, to remove all auto traffic, replace roads with "people movers," and the like. None of that ever happened.

53 posted on 12/30/2011 10:33:30 AM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: hinckley buzzard; Carry_Okie

>> “Yellowstone had a master plan approved in 1972, to remove all auto traffic, replace roads with “people movers,” and the like. None of that ever happened.” <<

.
It will.

For Yosemite, they plan to block out all cars, and there is no plan for parking at the entrance either.


54 posted on 12/30/2011 11:47:09 AM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson