To: TBBT
In fact, if one were going to design a Republican opponent tailor-made to President Obamas liking, that opponent would be uniquely vulnerable to Obamas main rhetorical thrust (making class-warfare arguments), uniquely unsuited to take clear aim at Obamas least popular action as president (spearheading the passage of Obamacare), and uniquely strong in states that are unlikely to matter in the general election race. In all three of these ways, Romney is made to order for Obama while his chief rival, Newt Gingrich, is not.
Exactly, times a million. Why do so many not understand that Romney will LOSE to Obama in 2012, precisely for reasons like this?
4 posted on
12/31/2011 7:43:11 AM PST by
Utmost Certainty
(Our Enemy, the State | Gingrich 2012)
To: Utmost Certainty
You cant tall that type of stupid anything.
If you listen to the only people that go on camera in support of Mitt, they can barely articulate an actual reason to back him outside of how “electable” he looks.
6 posted on
12/31/2011 7:49:21 AM PST by
VanDeKoik
(1 million in stimulus dollars paid for this tagline!)
To: Utmost Certainty
13 posted on
12/31/2011 8:07:45 AM PST by
CGalen
To: Utmost Certainty
Why do so many not understand that Romney will LOSE to Obama in 2012, precisely for reasons like this? That's nutz, a pile of dog shit could beat obummer in 2012 even with the whores and pimps of the msm kissing his halfrican, mooselimb, skinny ass for the rest of the year.
That miserable, slimy, corrupt, communist prick couldn't get re-elected in a one candidate race.
I'd have said what I really think about obummer, but I always feel more Christian on the eve of the New Year, and therefore will go gently on him.
FUBO
16 posted on
12/31/2011 8:20:01 AM PST by
USS Alaska
(Nuke The Terrorist Savages)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson