Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gleeaikin
Is there any truth to the rumor that if the pipeline is built from Canada tar sands to Texas it is going to be shipped to China?

For years, the only gasoline the U.S. exported was to Mexico -- which was a contract arrangement in exchange for Mexican crude.

The only reason we're exporting it now (and it's not much) is because U.S. consumption has declined -- and refineries have to run at or near-capacity to maintain production efficiency. And, at that, it's being exported to the Caribbean because there isn't enough pipeline capacity to ship it to the Northeast.

It's not feasible to ship gasoline from the Gulf to the Northeast via tanker because US law requires all shipments between US ports to be carried in American flag bottoms with fully unionized crew.

Because of that, it is more efficient to export the Gulf's excess to the Caribbean and import gasoline into the Northeast from, say, Nigeria.

In other words, it's not a nefarious plot by the evil oil companies...

16 posted on 12/31/2011 10:40:20 AM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance On Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: okie01
In other words, it's not a nefarious plot by the evil oil companies....

True.

It is, however a nefarious plot by the evil Marxists, unions and US Government.

23 posted on 12/31/2011 11:11:24 AM PST by Navy Patriot (Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it. (plagiarized))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: okie01; iowamark; Cyber Liberty; mamelukesabre; Figment; no-to-illegals; All

Having received a number of comments related to the issue of whether China will be the ultimate recipient of oil through the XL pipeline to Texas, I decided to do a little research. Here are some links for all to ponder and comment on. The first link is strongly negative.

http://stopbigoilripoffs.com/stop-the-keystone-xl-pipeline/

The second link is a technical report for the Dept. of Energy.

http://www.keystonepipeline-xl.state.gov/clientsite/keystonexl.nsf/AssmtDrftAccpt.pdf

The third explores various political and practical implications of the current delay and the argument that if we don’t build it here it will go to Vancouver.

http://www.keystonepipeline-xl.state.gov/clientsite/keystonexl.nsf/AssmtDrftAccpt.pdf

I will be interested to see any additional information that can be developed on this highly controversial topic.


50 posted on 12/31/2011 11:16:25 PM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson