Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NKP_Vet

Well ... I don’t agree. Now understand, I will not vote for RINO Romney. He is a liberal and a liar. Having said that, if he wins Iowa, at BEST he will get 30% That means 70% didn’t vote for him.

Therein lies the problem. The GOP doesn’t want Romney but the vote is diluted which may nominate the scumbag.


3 posted on 12/31/2011 7:52:03 PM PST by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RIghtwardHo

Right, everyone comes out of the woodwork with these “If X wins” then it means .... the end of the universe, etc.

It’s perfectly easy to see how Romney may win. The anti Romneys split the vote, and each of them has been found too imperfect to hold the lead.


5 posted on 12/31/2011 7:55:53 PM PST by Williams (Honey Badger Don't Care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: RIghtwardHo

Too bad it’s such a crappy field. I have to wonder if Palin isn’t kicking herself now. She could have had the nomination in a walk. It’s unreal that we’ve been reduced to the point of considering a statist retread like Gingrich as some great alternative plan to stop Willard.

In 2008, Willard was being pumped as a way to stop McCain. Four years later we’re still lost in the desert.


8 posted on 12/31/2011 7:59:33 PM PST by SoDak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson