Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/01/2012 1:00:25 PM PST by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: MinorityRepublican

It’s a good thing Obama doesn’t like babies — otherwise, he’d probably spend a Brazilian dollars to fix this problem.


2 posted on 01/01/2012 1:03:59 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (Nothing will change until after the war. It's coming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican

They can have our illegals.


4 posted on 01/01/2012 1:24:50 PM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican

women’s empowerment = national suicide


5 posted on 01/01/2012 1:29:26 PM PST by Jim Noble ("The Germans: At your feet, or at your throat" - Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican
a demographic shift that happened so fast it caught social scientists by surprise.

a.k.a. the "experts."

6 posted on 01/01/2012 1:30:38 PM PST by denydenydeny (The more a sys<tem is all about equality in theory the more it's an aristocracy in practice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican

In my opinion the major reasons for family reduction in First World or industrialized countries is that their is so much more to do with the leisure time available that making babies and having a family are pretty far down the list of ‘Fun’ things to do.


7 posted on 01/01/2012 1:35:38 PM PST by The Working Man (The mantra for BO's reign...."No Child Left a Dime")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican

That’s because their hot chicks keep leaving for America...


8 posted on 01/01/2012 1:36:31 PM PST by Caipirabob ( Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican

The richer the country the more each kid costs.


10 posted on 01/01/2012 2:12:49 PM PST by Mike Darancette (11/06/2012: Starts "Occupy the White House")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican

Yes and number of kids living on the streets and starving is about the same.


11 posted on 01/01/2012 2:17:59 PM PST by org.whodat (Just another heartless American, hated by "AMNESTY" Newt, Willard, Perry and nervous supporters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican

Does the Brazilian birth rate include all the Brazillegals in Framingham and Milford, Massachusetts? Those places are crawling with rugrats through 12 year olds who cannot speak anything but Portuguese...but who collect lavish Massachusetts welfare benefits and whose parents work only for cash under the table so as to avoid paying taxes.


12 posted on 01/01/2012 2:29:57 PM PST by MIchaelTArchangel (Romney ruined Massachusetts. Now he wants to ruin the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican
Well, if Brazilian women had a lot of children, then they wouldn't be able to afford all the plastic surgery they get. Brazil has one of the highest rates of plastic surgery in the world.
13 posted on 01/01/2012 2:30:37 PM PST by Nevadan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican

This phenomenon has long been known in demographics. A nation will have a high birthrate, until it reaches and economic plateau unique to that nation, and then its birthrate will suddenly plummet to just stabilization, and average of 2.1 to 2.3 children per family.

Importantly, government cannot substantially increase this birthrate, but it, and the national culture, can lower it considerably more.

In countries with high birthrates, children are seen as retirement insurance for their parents in their old age.

Right now this is happening in many places in central and South America, as well as in much of the Muslim world.

The odd demographics right now are in India and China, where male gender preference in children is so pronounced that as many as 30 or more million more males have been born than females, causing a very dangerous imbalance.

Even in such populated countries, men who cannot marry and likely will never be employed, are not just a national burden, but a positive risk. And a potentially very destructive one.


14 posted on 01/01/2012 2:47:31 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican
This thread is useless without pictures...


18 posted on 01/01/2012 3:16:56 PM PST by aMorePerfectUnion (You know, 99.99999965% of the lawyers give all of them a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican
Latin Americans have so many kids because they are predominately catholic and cant use birth control.

I wonder why they dont discuss this in the change in in demographics.

20 posted on 01/01/2012 3:34:06 PM PST by DainBramage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican
even though abortion is illegal, the Catholic Church opposes birth control and government-run family planning is rare.

Abortion is rare and the Catholic Church's influence is limited by the fact that liberation theology is so prevalent. You can, in most countries, walk in to any pharmacy and walk out with almost any birth control that you like. No government involvement needed or wanted. The ones that want many children have them, the ones that do not, do not.

Now you do have a number of girls with have out of wedlock babies but if they are in their teens the baby is raised by the grandparents.

32 posted on 01/01/2012 6:20:09 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (*Philosophy lesson 117-22b: Anyone who demands to be respected is undeserving of it.*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson