Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Valpal1

How do you know she’s not talking to media? She’s talking to police, and we’re getting only her side of the story and the police are putting out their controlled information - the psycho picture. There was a domestic violence problem occurring as well as a custody problem. The wife is not innocent in this as seen by the court order for both to attend counseling. I place a lot of blame on the domestic violence laws, the custody laws, and the public records laws. The police shouldn’t be putting out photos trying to vilify the guy. His marriage records should not be made public.

I think this young man felt he was being driven into a corner where he thought he was going to lose big time and never recover from it, and he snapped.


25 posted on 01/03/2012 1:42:08 AM PST by AlmaKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: AlmaKing

Because I can read. The article specifically states “in an affadavit” indicating the source of the wife’s statements is public court documents, not the wife in person.

Court records are public unless you request them to be sealed for specific reasons that outweigh the general public right to know. I don’t want to live in a country with secret court proceedings.

I feel sorry for the young man, but his tatoos suggest a great deal of his problems were of his own making.


26 posted on 01/03/2012 8:51:59 AM PST by Valpal1 (Worst tyranny is to force a man to pay for what he does not want because you think it good for him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson