Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ABC News Interview: Gingrich Says He’ll Hit Romney ‘Every Day’
abc news ^ | Jan 2, 2012 | abc news

Posted on 01/02/2012 12:34:20 PM PST by Berlin_Freeper

INDEPENDENCE, Iowa — No more Mr. Nice Guy. Newt Gingrich will “draw a very clear contrast” with Romney “every day” immediately after the Iowa caucuses Tuesday, the former House speaker told ABC News.

“Everything we say will have Romney’s quote, Romney’s videotape, Romney’s record; it’ll all be based explicitly on Romney,” Gingrich said in an interview in Independence, Iowa.

Gingrich has said repeatedly that Republicans should aim their attacks at President Obama, not fellow Republicans. But after getting hammered by millions of dollars in negative ads, Gingrich says he will now return fire, targeting Romney over and over again.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cheater; crybaby; freddiemac; gingrich; mittens; newtsunstable; nicehair
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-75 next last

1 posted on 01/02/2012 12:34:22 PM PST by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

Go Newt but keep an eye on that Santorum guy.


2 posted on 01/02/2012 12:38:15 PM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper
...Gingrich will “draw a very clear contrast” with Romney “every day” immediately after the Iowa caucuses...

Geez. Why not start today? It would be appreciated by people like me who hate Mittens.

3 posted on 01/02/2012 12:38:57 PM PST by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

We need a .gif of Newt endlessly punching Willard.


4 posted on 01/02/2012 12:40:57 PM PST by Old Sarge (RIP FReeper Skyraider (1930-2011) - You Are Missed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

“I will be the nominee.” LOL


5 posted on 01/02/2012 12:41:17 PM PST by nhwingut (Sarah Palin 12... No One Else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer

Go Newt but keep an eye on that Santorum guy.

Yes Newt watch out for that MORAL CONSERVATIVE. He is winning because he is true to conservative principles and has an incredible marriage. Love it!!!! Go Rick Sanotrum!!! You are without a doubt the MORAL CONSERVATIVE!!!!!


6 posted on 01/02/2012 12:41:50 PM PST by napscoordinator (A miracle is happening before our eyes! The ONLY MORAL CONSERVATIVE!!! Rick Santorum 2012!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

WOOT!

GO NEWT!

about freaking time!

I want to see Romney driven down into the single digits and then politically burried after Florida forever along with his magic underware.

I guess Newt suddenly remembered that... nice guys finish last.


7 posted on 01/02/2012 12:43:56 PM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (Gingrich/Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
I fear "MORAL CONSERVATIVE" = "COMPASSIONATE CONSERVATIVE"
8 posted on 01/02/2012 12:44:40 PM PST by JoSixChip (Top 10% of wage earners pay 70% of total income taxes collected. Bottom 50% pay less then 3%, fair?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper
May I suggest using your night stick, officer candidate?
9 posted on 01/02/2012 12:50:45 PM PST by NonValueAdded ("At a time like this, we can't afford the luxury of thinking!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper; All

The Duggar family patriarch traveled with 12 of his children to the Hawkeye State from their home in Arkansas — with the message that voters with “conservative family values have to get behind Rick Santorum for President.”

Read more: http://www.myfoxla.com/dpps/news/politics/duggar-family-stumps-for-rick-santorum-dpgonc-20110102-to_16755595#ixzz1iKr5ha5b


10 posted on 01/02/2012 12:51:27 PM PST by patriot08 (TEXAS GAL- born and bred and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

Santorum in NH, 3.5%.

In SC, 2.7%,

in FL, 1.5%.

It remains to be seen if he will get a bump out of his IA surge.


11 posted on 01/02/2012 12:52:23 PM PST by ez (When you're a hammer, everything looks like a nail. | FR Class of '98 |)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

Praise the Lord!!! It’s time.


12 posted on 01/02/2012 12:52:35 PM PST by CainConservative ( Newt/Rubio 2012 with Cain, Bolton, Santorum, Perry, Watts, Duncan, & Bachmann in Newt's Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

Newt is Mitt’s stalking horse, to make it look like Mitt’s nomination is not as planned as it really is.

The only one who beats up any of these frauds on policy is Ron Paul, and everybody knows it.

But hey, not everyone agrees with Paul’s foreign policy strategy, so let’s throw out him nailing the economic salvation of the country, too.

And in the mean time, enable Mittens to get in.

Because Mitt has a foreign policy plan you’re going to LOVE - once you hear about it through the Pony Express, after the economy crashes and the electricity is turned off.

Great plan. Just frickin’ great.


13 posted on 01/02/2012 12:52:38 PM PST by Talisker (History will show the Illuminati won the ultimate Darwin Award.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip

I don’t think so. I think RIck Santorum is way different than George W. Bush. We will see. I have to get going so I don’t have time to go into details between the two but you probably know they are both different.


14 posted on 01/02/2012 12:53:05 PM PST by napscoordinator (A miracle is happening before our eyes! The ONLY MORAL CONSERVATIVE!!! Rick Santorum 2012!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer
Go Newt but keep an eye on that Santorum guy.

1. Santorum does not have the money to go after Newt.
2. We Santorum supporters are more likely to later consider those who aim at Obama & Romney (Newt) over those who don't (Bachmann).
15 posted on 01/02/2012 12:54:47 PM PST by Dr. Sivana (May Mitt Romney be the Mo Udall of 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer
Go Newt but keep an eye on that Santorum guy.

Also, even if Santorum finishes ahead of Newt, he is not at all competitive in NH, but Newt might be. If it goes "Santorum, Paul, Newt, Romney", then Newt becomes a player in NH and beyond, and Santorum gets to dstick around for the South and rust belt states.
16 posted on 01/02/2012 12:56:35 PM PST by Dr. Sivana (May Mitt Romney be the Mo Udall of 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Successful incredible marriage???

Not to be a jerk but so does Jimmy Carter, Barack Obama, Harry Reid, and Newt Gingrich for the last 11 years.


17 posted on 01/02/2012 12:56:51 PM PST by CainConservative ( Newt/Rubio 2012 with Cain, Bolton, Santorum, Perry, Watts, Duncan, & Bachmann in Newt's Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA
"...Gingrich will “draw a very clear contrast” with Romney “every day” immediately after the Iowa caucuses..."

Geez. Why not start today? It would be appreciated by people like me who hate Mittens.

I wondered the same thing myself - why is he waiting until AFTER Iowa?

18 posted on 01/02/2012 12:58:13 PM PST by alicewonders ((GO PERRY!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip; napscoordinator

That’s over the paygrade of some to grasp. Too hung up on the man’s marriage and not his knowledge or capability to lead. Reagan wouldn’t be moral enough for this crowd. Thank God the pie in the sky voter back then wasn’t as self righteous as they are now.


19 posted on 01/02/2012 1:00:45 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper
Gingrich Says He’ll Hit Romney ‘Every Day’

I thought he'd gotten his libido issues under control.

20 posted on 01/02/2012 1:01:32 PM PST by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Talisker
"Newt is Mitt’s stalking horse"

Dumbest thing ever said on this site (this year). Are you Paultards ever going to grow up or at least graduate college?

21 posted on 01/02/2012 1:02:36 PM PST by CainConservative ( Newt/Rubio 2012 with Cain, Bolton, Santorum, Perry, Watts, Duncan, & Bachmann in Newt's Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Rick Santorum has one big problem with Christian voters. Most Christians don’t believe in endless war and being the policemen of the world. So when Mr. Perfect Conservative Santorum claims to be such a good Catholic he needs to be asked why he goes against the Catholic Church in promoting endless war instead of peace. Wars should be started when they are absolutely necessary. Mr. Perfect Conservative needs to read the Cathecism of the Catholic Church.
Newt Gingrich believes in promoting peace, and if peace fail, then military might is justified. Newt Gingrich has forgotten more than Mr. Perfect Conservative Santorum will ever know. I love the way he likes to say how he has defeated democrats in a democratic state. He always leaves out the little fact that he lost to a democrat the last time he ran for the Senate in PA, because he supported RINO Arlen Specter over conservative Pat Toomey.


22 posted on 01/02/2012 1:06:13 PM PST by NKP_Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim

Not “hit on” ;)


23 posted on 01/02/2012 1:06:20 PM PST by CainConservative ( Newt/Rubio 2012 with Cain, Bolton, Santorum, Perry, Watts, Duncan, & Bachmann in Newt's Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ez

No because it’s based on Iowa and Iowa only events.

Insular and saturated for weeks by almost 10 candidates leads them to make silly votes. That is why all types of eventual losers won there.

Outside of that place, it’s going to be rapid and not kind to guys without cash.


24 posted on 01/02/2012 1:07:35 PM PST by VanDeKoik (1 million in stimulus dollars paid for this tagline!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
If by ‘moral conservative’ you mean supporter of abortion backing, 60th vote on Obamacare Arlen Specter, then I completely agree with you, that's Rick Santorum!
25 posted on 01/02/2012 1:09:11 PM PST by bramps (MIssion Impossible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

And lest not we forget, Ricky honestly and prougly said he came to Wash DC because of his daily admiration and education from Newt Gingrich.


26 posted on 01/02/2012 1:09:52 PM PST by CainConservative ( Newt/Rubio 2012 with Cain, Bolton, Santorum, Perry, Watts, Duncan, & Bachmann in Newt's Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: CainConservative

*proudly


27 posted on 01/02/2012 1:10:43 PM PST by CainConservative ( Newt/Rubio 2012 with Cain, Bolton, Santorum, Perry, Watts, Duncan, & Bachmann in Newt's Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

“I see dumb people...
... they’re everywhere...
... they walk around like everyone else...
... they don’t even know that they’re dumb...

And...
Some of them... the Paulnuts

...THEY POST HERE”


28 posted on 01/02/2012 1:21:57 PM PST by Gator113 (~Just livin' life, my way~.. Newt/Palin-West-2012."got a lot swirling around in my head.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

Good! I think Gingrich, to his credit, tried to handle the race on ideas alone. Romney, of course, doesn’t have any ideas and the few he has had in the past are probably to the left of Obama, so he doesn’t want that examined and he used his mega-bucks to launch a personal attack campaign against Gingrich. So Gingrich is going to have to respond to it.

I think he will do so effectively, if only because he has experience with this. Gingrich has always been hated by the establishment GOP and was basically dumped by them when he was Speaker because they were embarrassed by his success in getting the Contract with America through. Nothing has changed, and they still hate him.


29 posted on 01/02/2012 1:45:57 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livius

For the win!


30 posted on 01/02/2012 1:55:37 PM PST by CainConservative ( Newt/Rubio 2012 with Cain, Bolton, Santorum, Perry, Watts, Duncan, & Bachmann in Newt's Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

A nasty little man prone to tantrums. How dare we
Don’t get his lectures.


31 posted on 01/02/2012 1:58:12 PM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
“A nasty little man prone to tantrums. How dare we
Don’t get his lectures” It's so funny. Let the old gas bag go after Romney . see where it gets him. In the end the real Newt will come forward and it will not be pretty. He will come off as what he is , another old , fat white haired political hack from another time .I can't believe he continues to take the bait.
32 posted on 01/02/2012 2:05:44 PM PST by fantom (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: fantom

Gingrich will come off as the one person in the GOP who has actually accomplished something within our lifetime.


33 posted on 01/02/2012 2:15:33 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name
>> That’s over the paygrade of some to grasp. Too hung up on the man’s marriage and not his knowledge or capability to lead. <<

I oppose Newt in the primary precisely BECAUSE of concerns about "knowledge or capability to lead". Newt embraces liberal garbage like man made global warming because he wants to seen as an intellectual, enlightened conservative and get favorable press coverage. Clinton ran circles around this guy during the brief time Newt was given a leadership job, notwithstanding the history revisionism of his supporters. I remember the late 90s and it was NOT good for our side.

34 posted on 01/02/2012 2:16:14 PM PST by BillyBoy (Illegals for Perry/Gingrich 2012 : Don't be "heartless"/ Be "humane")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper
Memo to the Pubbies..in case you forget..the Target is OBAMA!!!!
35 posted on 01/02/2012 2:20:26 PM PST by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fantom
A Gingrich Presidency would immediately start helping our nation's economy get back on track. He would create a business friendly economy. You can tell who Romney and Zero are both most afraid of.

We need a strong contrast between the Marxist in the Whitehouse and our candidate. Romney will be on defense because Zero will mock him for supporting Obamacare. Zero wants to run against Romney because the Conservative base will shun Romney. SHUN on record levels.

A President GIngrich presidency will create jobs.


36 posted on 01/02/2012 2:21:18 PM PST by show
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Gott’a love you single issue guys.


37 posted on 01/02/2012 2:21:56 PM PST by mmanager (Reagan Revolution + Republican Revolution = Bury Obama in 2012 - Go Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone
Tell Romney and his surrogate Bachman to focus on Zero. But no, they have to go after the person who worked with Reagan and balanced the budget for 4 years as Speaker.

Newt wins and as Newt fine tunes honest critiques against Romney, Romney won't know what hit him. Newt approached the debates with a focus on Zero. But if Romney wants him to focus his articulate sound bytes on Romney, then he asked for it.

Must See TV at next debate because Newt will focus his debate at Romney with honest critiques.

38 posted on 01/02/2012 2:27:33 PM PST by show
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip
I fear "MORAL CONSERVATIVE" = "COMPASSIONATE CONSERVATIVE"

I think with Santorum we're ok. Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich are the Compassionate Conservatives in the race.
39 posted on 01/02/2012 2:32:04 PM PST by o2bfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CainConservative

When Santorum falls out, and I would suspect it be after
SC, he’ll get behind his self-professed “mentor”
Newt Gingrich. No way he supports the liberal Romney.
As a matter of fact all of the contenders will end up
supporting Gingrich over Romney, or be the laughing stock of their state when they go back home.


40 posted on 01/02/2012 2:38:57 PM PST by NKP_Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet
As a matter of fact all of the contenders will end up supporting Gingrich over Romney, or be the laughing stock of their state when they go back home.

So true....we just have to watch them all fall behind Newt as time moves forward. He'll be just fine and knows how this game is played....so does Santorum...they'll all ride the waves until the sea calms.

Go Newt Go!

41 posted on 01/02/2012 2:44:15 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet
>> Rick Santorum has one big problem with Christian voters. <<

Yes. All the other candidates saying they are entitled the Christian vote merely because they self-identify as "Christian" want to pretend they are the only Christian running for President.

>> Most Christians don’t believe in endless war and being the policemen of the world. <<

By any chance do you go to ANSWER rallies and hang out with Cindy Sheehan? You seem to have their talking points memorized. Just start calling Rick Santorum a "chickenhawk neo-con" and you're all set.

>> So when Mr. Perfect Conservative Santorum <<

Neither Rick Santorum nor his supporters claim he is a "Perfect Conservative". The only people who use the phrase "Perfect Conservative" are supporters of other candidates who whine "you're a PURIST!! you want PERFECTION!!" when we point out their candidate has a lousy track record, stands little chance of "beating Obama" and is overall a terrible nominee. The fact we would prefer a decent and respectable candidate with a reliable track record doesn't mean we are demanding "perfection" except in the minds of bitter Rick Perry, Newt Gingrich, etc., supporters.

>> claims to be such a good Catholic he needs to be asked why he goes against the Catholic Church in promoting endless war instead of peace. Wars should be started when they are absolutely necessary. <<

Allow me to quote the Pope himself on what the "Catholic Church" says about just war:

"Not all moral issues have the same moral weight as abortion and euthanasia. For example, if a Catholic were to be at odds with the Holy Father on the application of capital punishment or on the decision to wage war, he would not for that reason be considered unworthy to present himself to receive Holy Communion. While the Church exhorts civil authorities to seek peace, not war, and to exercise discretion and mercy in imposing punishment on criminals, it may still be permissible to take up arms to repel an aggressor or to have recourse to capital punishment. There may be a legitimate diversity of opinion even among Catholics about waging war"
http://www.priestsforlife.org/magisterium/bishops/04-07ratzingerommunion.htm

>> Mr. Perfect Conservative needs to read the Cathecism of the Catholic Church. <<

What part would you like him to read? The part about grounds for a just war? As I just noted, the Pope himself said there is a wide variety of ways to intrepret whether a war is just and you can be a good Catholic if your intrepetation is different from the Pope's. Do you think the Catholic Church is a pacifist organziation who opposes taking out Islamic extremists? That would be news to the crusaders who decided to engage in "endless war" because the Pope called for it. It seems you are confusing the Cathecism of the Catholic Church with the latest Ron Paul manifesto.

>> Newt Gingrich believes in promoting peace, and if peace fail, then military might is justified. Newt Gingrich has forgotten more than Mr. Perfect Conservative Santorum will ever know. <<

Perhaps Newt Gingrich should read the section of the Cathecism of the Catholic Church that talks about how life begins at conception. Your hero Newt the "good Catholic" got that wrong just a few weeks ago when he said life begins at implantation, directly defying Catholic teachings. Of course, Rick Santorum didn't join the Catholic Church because he was a Georgia Baptist who was banging some Catholic staffer 20 years younger while married to someone else. It seems there's another "Catholic" candidate for President who "found" Catholicism that way.

>> I love the way he likes to say how he has defeated democrats in a democratic state. He always leaves out the little fact that he lost to a democrat the last time <<

I love the way Newt supporters like to say he was "removed" from Congress by a "coup" lead by "RINOs". They always leave out the little fact the actual coup against Newt in 1997 failed because the RINOs were on his side, and that Newt resigned suddenly in 1998 after the GOP lost five seats under his "leadership", leaving the House Republicans in disarray as they scrambled to find a new Speaker before finally settling on Hastert after Bob Livingston wouldn't take it. I guess the facts don't go well with their "Newt was such a terrific conservative leader until RINOs removed him" history revisionism.

>> he ran for the Senate in PA, because he supported RINO Arlen Specter over conservative Pat Toomey. <<

Yet you, like all Newt supporters, apparently have no problem with Newt backing the even more liberal Dede Scozzafava over the conservative Doug Hoffman. Newt did that on his own as a private citizen. Why is it OK when Newt endorses someone to the LEFT of Arlen Specter? Interesting double standard you have.

42 posted on 01/02/2012 2:47:10 PM PST by BillyBoy (Illegals for Perry/Gingrich 2012 : Don't be "heartless"/ Be "humane")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Talisker
The only one who beats up any of these frauds on policy is Ron Paul, and everybody knows it.

You have got to be kidding....Ron Paul? Who cares or listens to what he has to say about any candidate....he can't lift a candle to a one of them and is only there to cover Romney's back. Hasn't accomplished a dang thing in congress despite his bellowing what he wants...he flatlined every time with any of his purposals.

Paul's worse than a traitor to this country because he hides his real intentions by using the constitution as his mask....and his supporters buy it hook line and sinker....even after Pauls been clearly exposed they still cannot "see" thru the veil of deception Pauls's created for them to see thru....nor that the Obama administration is fully supportive of Ron PAul...Obama would love nothing else then creaming Paul in the Presidential debates...and he would be successful at doing just that...piece of cake

43 posted on 01/02/2012 2:58:22 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer

The Troll (Newt) stepped in it again by claiming to be “Romney Boated.” For my part, I gave more to the honorable Swiftboat Veterans for Truth than all other GOP candidates combined in 2004 and I an insulted, no enraged, that the Troll would coin an insult based on these patriots. He is a liberal asswipe and deserves no consideration.


44 posted on 01/02/2012 2:59:16 PM PST by anton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy

Doug Hoffman has come right out and stated nobody should hold that against Newt...and even he doesn’t....so your arguement is baseless in that respect. He understood why Newt did that and Newt has addressed his reasoning clearly for doing that. It’s dead wood. Nothing there....Hoffman put it to rest and so should you.


45 posted on 01/02/2012 3:01:33 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

This is a horse race and flushing out those along the way to see how they’re going to run seems to be on the front burner now and in the days ahead.

Newt needs to go after Romney.....as I ‘m afraid Bachman’s going to get behind Romney as suspected from the beginning of her run. She’d be a fool doing so but she seems to be doing foolish things along the way with frequency. So too will Ron Paul as his numbers fade out.. so Newt’s focusing on Romney is the way to go in the next round.

Imagine if it were to come down to Newt...Santorum and Romney!


46 posted on 01/02/2012 3:08:00 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: anton
Newt stepped in it again by claiming to be “Romney Boated.”

Well he was Romney Boated....calling it what it is makes perfect sense. It was the same 'play' Swift voters took out Kerry.....not the first time copies are made of what works.

Political races are not a place to be overly sensitive...BTW.

47 posted on 01/02/2012 3:12:35 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: caww

The putrid little Troll specifically referred to being “Romney Boated” as a reference to unethical or unfair tactics. That is what he meant and what he said and I stand by my opinion:

The Troll (Newt) stepped in it again by claiming to be “Romney Boated.” For my part, I gave more to the honorable Swiftboat Veterans for Truth than all other GOP candidates combined in 2004 and I an insulted, no enraged, that the Troll would coin an insult based on these patriots. He is a liberal asswipe and deserves no consideration.


48 posted on 01/02/2012 3:16:30 PM PST by anton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: anton

Now your remark is just plain stupid. Newt was asked if he was “Swift Boated”. He said he was “Romney Boated”. Two completely different things. Apparently your reading comprehension skills are severely diminished if you cannot see the difference. You are the troll.


49 posted on 01/02/2012 3:29:07 PM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: anton

“That is what he meant and what he said and I stand by my opinion”
_________________________________________________________
First part of your sentence implies factual knowledge, followed by an admission of opinion...Which one is it?
You’ve got to lighten up a little....

Guy goes to a doctor and says, “What’s the matter with me doc?” One moment I think I’m a wigwam and the next moment I think I’m a teepee. The doctor thinks for a moment and says, “You’re two tents”.


50 posted on 01/02/2012 3:40:56 PM PST by sanjuanbob (Festina Lente)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson