There are three supreme court cases that define quite clearly what constitutes a “natural born citizen”. A child born on US soil to parents who where citizens of the US prior to the child’s birth.
There are those who have changed the words of numerous supreme court cases found on line so as to hide the above “FACT”.
First, which of those three cases, which I have read, went to the merits of eligibility for POTUS? Second, why would you suggest someone has changed anything related to these three cases in order to hide them? I found them, and the issues to which they addressed (none being related to eligibility for POTUS). If you and I can find these three cases, why would you think constititional law scholars or practicing attorneys would be unable to find them, if they indeed pertained to the issue of eligibility for POTUS? The unfortunate reality is that there is no existing case law which speaks directly to the issue of citizenship eligibility with respect to whether the person running for POTUS has parents who were born in another country, other than opinions by legal scholars, which hold no legal weight.
Name the Supreme Court cases.