To: Nachum
motions to dismiss are routine.
It is very rare for them to be granted.
There is nothing special about this being denied. Jumping up and down like this is a big victory is silly.
16 posted on
01/03/2012 3:21:00 PM PST by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: longtermmemmory; mojitojoe; little jeremiah
There is nothing special about this being denied. Jumping up and down like this is a big victory is silly. I'll bite, and hope some there is still some justice after all.
I won't hold my breath but hey, ya never know!
17 posted on
01/03/2012 3:25:32 PM PST by
Las Vegas Ron
(Rush Limbaugh = the Beethoven of talk radio)
To: longtermmemmory
A moot point of law was dismissed in this particular motion, if my meager understanding of the judge’s ruling is correct. Freepers have already posted links to the public documents. A motion to sever Plaintiffs was granted, and another motion to dismiss by defendant Barry Soetoro’s attorneys was denied. Orly Taitz, warts and all continues the good fight.
21 posted on
01/03/2012 3:32:17 PM PST by
freepersup
(Today, we raise our glasses of spirits and mugs of ale high- to Budge.)
To: longtermmemmory
You might want to read the judge’s response to the motion. Common sense was applied. Quelle horreur!
24 posted on
01/03/2012 3:45:01 PM PST by
Hoosier-Daddy
( "It does no good to be a super power if you have to worry what the neighbors think." BuffaloJack)
To: longtermmemmory
motions to dismiss are routine. It is very rare for them to be granted.
NORMALLY it is very rare for them to be granted.
It is exceedingly common for challenges to Obama's eligibility to be dismissed on any pretext.
50 posted on
01/03/2012 5:37:54 PM PST by
null and void
(Day 1078 of America's ObamaVacation from reality [Heroes aren't made, Frank, they're cornered...])
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson