There is no way this action can be allowed to stand. If it does, it basically means precedent has been set that confirmation is not actually needed. This should be thrown out post-haste. I can’t believe he could have been advised that he can get away with this Constitutionally.
This is what is being said to him: "It is Constitutional until someone says its not, and attempts to enforce the Constitution. Until then, we can do whatever we please. Signing statement, czars, 'recess' appointments, Fast & Furious, voter fraud, etc. Who is going to stop us. HA! HA! HA! HA! HA!"
Actually, they probably didn't say "HA! HA! HA! HA! HA!"