1 posted on
01/05/2012 6:12:59 PM PST by
mnehring
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
To: mnehring
Interesting....Does anyone here know what the consequences might be?
2 posted on
01/05/2012 6:15:42 PM PST by
maeng
( l)
To: mnehring
Interesting....Does anyone here know what the consequences might be?
3 posted on
01/05/2012 6:16:02 PM PST by
maeng
( l)
To: mnehring
IIRC the “official tally” will not be completed for a couple of week. Since it’s this close, I’d suggest they both hold their breath. ;~)
5 posted on
01/05/2012 6:18:13 PM PST by
hoosiermama
(GAME-ON!)
To: mnehring
Yes, the person that originally lied, will have to lie again, and claim it was a mistake.
Then, Rick, as winner, will carry 13 of Iowa’s delegates to the convention and Mitt will carry 12.
8 posted on
01/05/2012 6:21:45 PM PST by
G Larry
("I dream of a day when a man is judged by the content of his Character.")
To: mnehring
He said when he checked to make sure the Republican Party of Iowa got the count right, he said he was shocked to find they hadn't.
Edward "True", must have suspected something for him to follow up on the numbers. Interesting.....
To: mnehring
Wow, and Snitt Romney was so proud of finally getting an additional .0005 percent rather than never getting above 24% or something. I bet he'll throw a tantrum and fire someone in his campaign crowd.
10 posted on
01/05/2012 6:21:52 PM PST by
Rashputin
(Obama stark, raving, mad, and even his security people know it.)
To: Free Vulcan; stillafreemind
Given your closeness to the process and the caucus happenings, this is the kind of stuff I asked you guys about on an earlier thread.
Like I said, the narrative coming out of Tuesday had to be "Romney won" == whether or not it was actually true. Thoughts?
FReegards!
12 posted on
01/05/2012 6:23:09 PM PST by
Agamemnon
(Darwinism is the glue that holds liberalism together)
To: mnehring
This can easily be resolved by asking caucus goers at that location whether more than 2 of them supported Mitt!
13 posted on
01/05/2012 6:23:22 PM PST by
G Larry
("I dream of a day when a man is judged by the content of his Character.")
To: mnehring
It would make a big psychological difference. The media here in a Democrat and RINO GOP infected area quickly reported Romney won blah blah blah and he should carry it to the first IA/NH double win in blah blah blah. Some stories had no mention of Santorum only of the “winner” of Iowa.
To: Pan_Yan
18 posted on
01/05/2012 6:28:05 PM PST by
Pan_Yans Wife
("Real solidarity means coming together for the common good."-Sarah Palin)
To: mnehring
Bragging rights. Public perception. Momentum. These are bigger than a single delegate or two.
I don't do Photoshop, but somebody ought to Photoshop this image: (Swap Truman's face with Rick's; swap Dewey's name with Romney's; swamp Truman's name with Santorum's)
To: mnehring
I am aware of another mistake that caused the local press to be given the wrong numbers and caused the local press to report the wrong winner. The numbers that went to the party were, however correct. Stuff happens, especially when the numbers are so close.
22 posted on
01/05/2012 6:32:20 PM PST by
w1andsodidwe
(Barrak has now won the contest. He is even worse than Jimmah.)
To: mnehring
Romney appears to have CREATED fake votes and removed
other votes.
Team Romney is the MOST VICIOUS group of pseudoconservatives
that has ever existed.
They go after women, children, GOP candidates,
and all on the sly, like the DNC.
DISGUSTING, Mitt.
23 posted on
01/05/2012 6:34:06 PM PST by
Diogenesis
("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. " Pres. Ronald Reagan)
To: mnehring
Hope this shows up on the Drudge Report...
To: mnehring
Breaking News:
Santorum now up 12 but Rove just found 13 more Willard votes in Branstad’s glove compartment moments ago.
Willard wins by ONE, the Iowan establishment immediately reports. : (
j/k
29 posted on
01/05/2012 6:43:35 PM PST by
CainConservative
( Newt/Santorum 2012 with Cain, Huck, Bolton, Perry, Watts, Duncan, & Bachmann in Newt's Cabinet)
To: mnehring
To: mnehring
I’m not surprised at all. And for bragging rights and Mitt’s cause it does matter.
35 posted on
01/05/2012 6:48:22 PM PST by
reaganaut
(If Romney is a conservative then IÂ’m the frickin Angel Moroni.)
To: mnehring
I noted on another thread, with no responses, that toward the end of last night Fox reported on one precinct that had "misplaced" their tally but agreed that Romney had won....
Kind'a weird.
40 posted on
01/05/2012 7:01:23 PM PST by
norton
To: mnehring
41 posted on
01/05/2012 7:02:52 PM PST by
FrankR
(What you resist...PERSISTS!)
To: mnehring
The Iowa caucus does not have a strong history of picking the finale winner of the nomination. No history to rewrite.
2008 Mike Huckabee (34%), Mitt Romney (25%), Fred Thompson (13%), John McCain (13%), Ron Paul (10%), Rudy Giuliani (4%), and Duncan Hunter (1%)
42 posted on
01/05/2012 7:02:56 PM PST by
ThomasThomas
(The right has common sense and the OWS folks have common scents.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson