To: org.whodat
The FACT remains he was NOT “fined.” PERIOD.
6 posted on
01/06/2012 8:10:30 PM PST by
piytar
(The Obama Depression. Say it early, say it often. Why? Because it's TRUE.)
To: piytar
Sort of like his position on amnesty, it is not amnesty if you call it something else, and he paid the house 300000 large in a plea deal so the other 84 charges were dropped. It it looks like a duck and walks like a duck it is a duck. And it looks like a fine to me. And in noots world lobbying is discussing historical trends, lol.
16 posted on
01/06/2012 8:23:42 PM PST by
org.whodat
(Just another heartless American, hated by "AMNESTY" Newt, Willard, Perry and nervous supporters.)
To: piytar
The FACT remains he was NOT “fined.” PERIOD.
So, then, why did he have to borrow money from Bob Dole to pay part of the 'non fine'?
Gingrich is parsing and nuancing.
Maybe he was just donating $300,000 to the House Ethics Committee's annual ballroom dance. [/s]
32 posted on
01/06/2012 8:36:42 PM PST by
TomGuy
To: piytar; org.whodat
“The FACT remains he was NOT “fined.” PERIOD.”
Another fact is that each and every one of those “ethics complaints” was known to be groundless by the demonrat who filed it.
147 posted on
01/06/2012 11:07:12 PM PST by
dsc
(Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
To: piytar
But he was charged $300K as a ‘reprimand’ and ‘sanction’.
To: piytar
But he was charged $300K as a ‘reprimand’ and ‘sanction’.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson