Lot's of truth in that. Let's examine the record.
Bush: big spender, weak on immigration, couldn't win any wars. Talked like a conservative.
Obama: big spender, weak on immigration, couldn't win any wars. Talked like a liberal.
Sure, they talked differently. But they had much in common. Bush's only great accomplishment was that he kept the homeland safe. Now Obama can claim that very same thing.
So who would be different? Palin, Cain, Paul. The first two are out. The third one does not inspire confidence, in me at least.
Only because of the ineptitude of a couple of terrorists -Times Square/Underwear
Ron Paul is an open borders nut, who thinks that securing our borders will keep us from emigrating to flee the government. He opposes all actual attempts to reduce immigration.
Only if you look at the short run, and the folks who want a caliphate don't do that. By embracing CAIR and not protecting our borders, Bush reduced our safety in the long run.