Replies

Didn’t even look at the article yet... The headline grabbed me quick enough — what limits is he talking about??? This goes for ANYONE who suggests “limits” - are they talking about RESPONSIBILITY for one’s actions (like not providing child pornography on the internet, or support for known violent terrorist groups), or are they trying to take over the power to control a vast majority of things on the internet in the name of “our own good”? There’s a difference between the two actions.

Live killings or videos, terrorist or other criminal propaganda or providing access to illegal materials (like child pornography for instance) or providing support to or materials from known criminals, or is he talking about the “people” and our right to access information.

Google is already rolling out “personalized” search results based on what you and your friends look at one the internet through Google+ instead of the “whole net”. How long till they roll that out for “everyone”? With politicians who support this line of thinking as “friends”, it wouldn’t surprise me if they all support this SOPA legislation.

SOPA gives too much power to the government, plain and simple. Any politician who doesn’t see the danger inherent in that shouldn’t be President, IMO.

[Now I’ll go and read the article - don’t throw stones at me if this is some hit piece on him, OK? I don’t like bad journalism just as much as I dislike bad politicians.]