[An.American.Expatriate]

In fact, I suspect you probably got the idea from reading my post to begin with.

See my Post 6

[edge919]

That post doesn’t mention anything about the governor’s responsibility toward vetting presidential candidates.

Of course, this idea, again, isn’t new:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2824280/posts?page=31#31

“Ummmm, you’ve ignored that the first half of the unanimous opinion of 3 based the meat of their decision on denying that the governor had any responsibility to vet presidential candidates.”