I read the pdf instead.
The plantifs were idiots who thought they were smart. Thier arguments were rejected as flawed by the court. The appeal affirmed that decision. There was nothing left to appeal and they probably ran out of time / money etc ...
I find it quite odd for someone to come to the forum with an agenda and immediately challenge the forum to explain WHY some idoits didn’t appeal the case in question further to the US Supreme Court.
Read post #27. The court contradicted itself several times and made several flawed and unsupported arguments in response to the plaintiffs. The only thing they really did was say that they didn’t have to accept the plaintiff’s arguments as true. It’s a very poorly written and supported decision. Read post #27.