[ “overwhelmingly approved by Oklahoma voters last year, prevents judges from basing rulings on international law — and specifically mentions Islamic law, often known as Shariah law. “
Isn’t this a good thing as they must pass laws based on the Constitution - not other laws? ]
In this PC environment they should have just put in “Internationally Recognized Religious Law Systems” or some other such language that would cover Sharia but not mention it directly. That way the SCUM lawyers would look like fools trying to go against it.
I remember when supreme court Brewer said the courts should not just look at the Constitution but at international laws as well and everyone got upset as they should only look at the Constitution - Scalia (sp) noted should we look at muslim laws for gay rights?
We all said the courts should only look at the Constitution.
Either this article is poorly written on what happened or I don’t see the problem.