Willard is his father’s son...a go-along, get along “moderate,” who wants to be liked by all. Even the union bosses could get along fine with his dad, as they plundered the auto companies in Detroit.
Willard will lose because conservatives will stay home this election. Let Obama run the Democrat Party into oblivion. Maybe by 2016 even the RINOs will have had enough, and we can have another Carter/Reagan election.
“Willard will lose because conservatives will stay home this election.”
If Hussein weren’t the President from hell who fully intends to destroy our country, this may be true.
But in the end, I think many Conservatives will hold their nose and vote for Mitt if he is the candidate.
In another election, your statement might be true. But there is too much at stake this time around.
We know the danger of another four years of the regime. The question will be whether the drones figure it out in time.
Willard seems to think he is entitled to his CAMELOT, but he is more like Al Gore, who also thought he had entitlements.
I’m conservative and I’ll be fine with voting for Romney. He’s not my #1 and he’s not even in my top #20 of national conservatives. He is, however, quite different from Obama.
Conservatives need to get their eyes back on the real prize. The Senate and the House. Basically we need a super majority in the House to push very conservative solutions and a majority in the Senate (60 would be great but seems unlikely). A Romney administration would not be in the business of vetoing legislation from a Republican congress (just as he wasn’t in the business of vetoing legislation from a Democrat congress).
If Romney is not stopped in South Carolina (and frankly I don’t see a credible contender - though we’ll see what the negative adds do), conservatives will another path to influence. I guess some will find it acceptable to sit on their hands but have little respect for those who choose that path. There’s still a scenario to put the U.S. on a conservative path.