Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sick1
The Executive is required to take an oath to support the Constitution, not the opinions of judges.

It's not really very complicated.

"Where is the security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation desert the oaths?"

-- George Washington


139 posted on 01/12/2012 6:18:13 PM PST by EternalVigilance (The Republican Party is dead. The Republic is not. At least not yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]


To: EternalVigilance

Neither the quote nor the statement answers the core question. If the Executive is performing the function of the Judiciary - what is the Judiciary’s actual value/role? Secondly, when a Liberal is elected - will you be happy with their interpretation of constitutionality? Remember, they have a radically different view and despite all our wishes - Liberals do get elected.


140 posted on 01/12/2012 7:01:29 PM PST by sick1 (Don't fear the freeper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson