Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dfwgator; tsowellfan

” If our side had consolidated into one candidate Romney would be in big trouble. “<<<

” The problem is none of the alternatives really stand out against the others, they all have tremendous flaws, while they do have good points as well. “ <<<

What does it matter, really? The single message heard loud and clear is that 65% of the Republicans, at minimum, DO NOT WANT the Cram Down candidate. We have been rebelling and because of it we havre been sold a crock of idle threats that a two caucus states, with open primaries, and with enemies voting in the mix, seals the nomination and closes the nomination process? What a crock. Altogether, their are what, 13 lousy delegates? Laughable.

Rebel on!


49 posted on 01/11/2012 8:31:08 PM PST by RitaOK (LET 'ER RIP, NEWT. NEWT 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: RitaOK
What a crock

Well, just today Newt expressed that crock.

As Gingrich has pointed out, if the non-Romney forces could coalesce behind a single candidate, Romney would be trailing in this race. But Republican voters can’t seem to solve this coordination problem, and the non-Romney candidates are suffering from a collective action dilemma; all would benefit by having one of the remaining three.

60 posted on 01/11/2012 8:44:36 PM PST by tsowellfan (I dont need to read the papers. Rush & Mark do it for me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson