Posted on 01/12/2012 12:29:33 PM PST by jazusamo
I really don’t know either.
I know there are supposed climate “scientists” that say it’s man made but I’m sure that those “scientists” come from the enviro-nazi type people prevalent in all forms of the enviro nutjob movement.
Thanks for that link. The EPA is working overtime to see just how many people they can put out of work, they have be eliminated and soon.
That’s good, very good and true!
Me “ Unions controlled by communist scum”.
[I]t is clear that as long as Congress is effectively controlled by climate change deniers, all of us investors, companies, workers and the broader public must take action ourselves, Trumka said.)
This may be hard for you to understand assclown, but those in Congress were ELECTED BY THE PEOPLE to represent us. YOU WERE NOT.................
Maybe Trumka should go ‘splain it to the 25,000 unemployed union members who would have jobs on the Keystone Pipeline if not for his buddy Obama and the Warm Mongers.
The big offenders appear to be energy, metals, and food. Guess we’ll just have to learn to get by without those things.
The left is, for the most part, an alliance between power-mad charlatans and good-hearted folk who are clueless about the way the world (esp. economics) works. In some cases one gets power-mad charlatans who are clueless about the way the world works. It seems Trumka falls into this last category.
Ah, you still speak English. Trumka speaks Newspeak.
In Newspeak, the phrase “climate change” can have the same denotation as the English phrases “global warming”, “anthropogenic global warming”, “climate change” or “anthropogenic climate change” as suits The Party at any given moment.
If Dick “Mumbles” Trumka is a strong proponent of “global warming” theory, then you KNOW it’s a scam and a shakedown.
*That* is the key statement. It's not about real or imagined global warming, it's about the legislation that fills the coffers of union thugs and other sundry scum. Actually, I'm surprised he went on the record with that statement. A lapse of judgement in the 'heat' of the moment, perhaps...
Wow...There actually is a resemblance in looks and deeds.
What would their answer be?
I really dont know. All you hear is consensus and some mumbling about the UN reports. Never any science.
I like to ask them how their science can completely rule out solar activity as a cause of intermittent warming. I concede that CO2 is a greenhouse gas but without an impermeable ceiling, and with the presence of salt-water oceans that absorb CO2, how is it that the earth is a greenhouse?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.