To: sukhoi-30mki
If you lined 3 or 4 of these in sequence, 30 seconds apart, wouldn’t that just keep digging the hole deeper until it was sufficient?
6 posted on
01/12/2012 8:54:18 PM PST by
Allon
(Since 1980, no Republican has won his party's nomination without winning in South Carolina.)
To: Allon
7 posted on
01/12/2012 8:59:13 PM PST by
rawhide
To: Allon
If you lined 3 or 4 of these in sequence, 30 seconds apart, wouldnt that just keep digging the hole deeper until it was sufficient?
I think you’re right. The Soviets had planned to do just that, but with nukes, on Cheyenne Mountain, CO, NORAD HQ. I think it’s called “Hammering”.
Someone will correct me, I’m sure.
11 posted on
01/12/2012 9:05:17 PM PST by
unkus
(Silence Is Consent)
To: Allon
Right thinking is rewarded. You are correct. Also available, should the target designation be accurate, might be the old "skip bomb" technique or better yet a cruise missile of a high explosive conventional nature.
We of course have non-conventional cruise missiles that are also flyable into tunnel openings.
14 posted on
01/12/2012 9:15:59 PM PST by
John S Mosby
(Sic Semper Tyrannis)
To: Allon
I heard that idea several years ago, but it involved spacing them closely enough that the follow-on bomb hit while the rubble from its predecesor was still in the air.
18 posted on
01/12/2012 9:21:24 PM PST by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: Allon
If you lined 3 or 4 of these in sequence, 30 seconds apart, wouldnt that just keep digging the hole deeper until it was sufficient? That's what I thought. Keep it up for a few days. If nothing else, it would bury their plant under a mound a rubble that would need months to excavate.
30 posted on
01/12/2012 10:25:56 PM PST by
PGR88
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson