Dear FRiend, I’m not sure about the landscaper reference in your reply. Post no. 9 did have a reference to a landscaper.
Please see my post 90 on this thread. That is my honest assessment on Santorum.
I hope you are right and I am wrong, but in the fight I see ahead, color me skeptical.
There is a full court press right now for the United States to buy into Europe’s view of global warming, and join it to implement massive fixes.
It is my opinion that despite what Newt says, he is still convinced man is causing global warming, and something drastic needs to be done.
I share your view of Obama. I think he is a craven enemy of our nation. The problem for me, is that I recognize it is possible for someone on our side to get so focused on certain causes, that they would do severe damage to our nation even though they meant well.
Would Newt join the left to try to force U. S. Citizens out of their cars? Would he support the EPA setting standards that would nearly destroy our industrial companies? Would he set some limits on what size homes we could have, or what type of things we could continue to buy.
Newt couldn’t keep an oath to either of his first two wives, but wants me to accept his promise that he will be dedicated to the betterment of our nation.
So far, I can’t. I may have to at some point.
You may be right. I’ve been wrong before. It was one time when I incorrectly admitted to being wrong though.
;^)
We’ll see. I’m not as convinced as you are that a straight up choice between Obama and Santorum would result in Obama remaining president.
In early 1980, folks were saying Reagan couldn’t win over Carter. I’m not making the case that Santorum is Reagan by any means, but I don’t see his negatives in nearly the same light I do the others.