The whole discussion is about whether one is allowed to ever speak negatively about behavior. You claim never, yet you are judging me. What a laugh.
******************
No!!! Yu’re not off the hook for your un-Christian position. The discussion is NOT about speaking to negative behavior, it’s about Dobson and you saying that Calista can not be a First Lady because she is “immoral”!
That’s the discussion. That’s why you’re losing the debate! Because your position is un-Christian and indefensible.
You and Dobson prefer a different candidate- fine!!!! To caste Calista as a prostitute unfitting of being First Lady in order to support your nominee, is a black mark to one’s soul.
Contrary to your dismissive- “that’s a laugh”— it is not! Thankfully, there is a forgivng God.
Unfortunately, part of the discussion IS about that because you introduced the idea. Dobson DOES have the right to speak out contrary to your quoting a scripture intending to negate his right to do so.
You and Dobson prefer a different candidate- fine!!!!
Wrong yet again. I do NOT prefer a different candidate. I will vote for whoever takes the nomination against Obama. However, I am not avidly in favor of any of them.
To caste Calista as a prostitute
No, no one claimed this. You are again misrepresenting what was said.