Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin: I'd Vote for Newt in S. Carolina
newsmax ^ | 1/17/2012 | newsmax

Posted on 01/17/2012 6:47:52 PM PST by TBBT

Former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin told Sean Hannity on Fox News Tuesday night that, if she were voting in the S. Carolina primary this coming Saturday, she would vote for Newt Gingrich for president.

Palin's husband Todd has already endorsed Gingrich for president.

Sarah Palin told Hannity that Gingrich won Monday night's Fox News debate. She said Gingrich espoused the ideas favored by most conservatives, including a strong work ethic and limited government.

She added that she is not fully endorsing Gingrich, but believes the primary race should continue and dismissed the idea that Gov. Mitt Romney is the "inevitable" candidate.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: alaska; newt; palin; sarahpalin; southcarolina
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
Why not go all the way? What is she waiting for?
1 posted on 01/17/2012 6:47:59 PM PST by TBBT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TBBT

I think she’s playing it cool, send the message without causing waves that will detract.

Mark Levin on Hannity now...


2 posted on 01/17/2012 6:50:31 PM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

The goal now is to prevent Romney from winning.


3 posted on 01/17/2012 6:51:10 PM PST by reasonisfaith (Or, more accurately---reason serves faith. See W.L. Craig, and many others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

That’s all the way to me.

The only way you vote for mittons is to keep Paul out


4 posted on 01/17/2012 6:53:38 PM PST by reefdiver ("Let His day's be few And another takes His office")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT
Why not go all the way? What is she waiting for?

It would be nice, but she's a huge target for both the liberals and the establishment Republicans, and this could be her way of endorsing Newt without becoming a distraction.

If you take it at face value, she is endorsing him.
5 posted on 01/17/2012 6:54:13 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Um, I would thing that “I would vote for” equals “endorse,” but i guess that’s so 20th Century.


6 posted on 01/17/2012 6:54:28 PM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

Karl Rove must be foaming at the mouth. Come on Newt take South Carolina. We have to stop Mitt. GO NEWT GO!


7 posted on 01/17/2012 6:54:42 PM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

Sounds like a done deal to me........the Palins are in for Newt.


8 posted on 01/17/2012 7:00:10 PM PST by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; Impy; GOPsterinMA; randita; Sun

If this denies Romney a primary victory, it’s worth it.


9 posted on 01/17/2012 7:00:42 PM PST by Clintonfatigued (A chameleon belongs in a pet store, not the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

Palin endorsed Newt. Let’s go FReepers. Let’s get this done.


10 posted on 01/17/2012 7:01:30 PM PST by MattinNJ (Palin endorsed Newt. I am all in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer
Karl Rove must be foaming at the mouth.

That is not how Rove works. Gingrich, Santorum and Romney are all Rove's candidates. Rove has no ideology and always gets more than one of his candidates into the primaries. As long as any of them win, it is fine. The main difference in the candidates is in their rhetoric on social issues. Neither Rove nor his candidates care one way or the other for these issues. They just want to ensure that no matter what the mood of the electorate at any given point in time, one of them gets the votes.

What they really care about is fiscal issues. On fiscal affairs, all of them are on the same side and are anxious to ensure that debts, deficits, corporate welfare, wall street bailouts and pork barrel projects are all in place. Much as many freepers don't like it, Santorum is a Rove protege just like Bush. Romney a Rove candidate. Even Huntsman the liberal is a Rove candidate who has been groomed for 2016. Rove just plays all over the ideological spectrum.

11 posted on 01/17/2012 7:03:50 PM PST by JimWayne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne

Ron Paul fan?


12 posted on 01/17/2012 7:07:50 PM PST by Rick_Michael ( 'REAL' Conservatives who witch hunt their own, are no better than Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

Excellent. I hope this helps Newt in SC. If Romney wins big in SC, it’s all but over.


13 posted on 01/17/2012 7:09:43 PM PST by newzjunkey (Imbecilic early voters doom us all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

NOTE: Inauguration Day, January 20, 2013, falls on a Sunday.

Imagine.... ZERO leaving in disgrace for Corrupt Chicago.

And President Newt Gingrich taking a solemn oath to restore our nation to our Founders intent.

Newt will put Our Country First. That is a FACT. Imagine Newt walking into the Oval Office, asking the Brits to bring back the Churchill Bust.

Imagine Newt quoting our Founders intent in REAL TIME on every occasion.

Newt, an Army brat who’s natural Father gave him up for adoption, who earned his PhD at age 28 and LOVES our country.

Elect Newt... Elect Newt because he has the grit and dedication to make our Founders proud. Imagine Zero making a pit-stop in Hawaii for appearances sake, on route to Chicago to reunite with his thug family... Because Zero feels most at home in Chicago, solo.


14 posted on 01/17/2012 7:13:59 PM PST by show
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

Because when you endorse someone that later loses you lose your influence with the one who does win.

And because she sees the target as being Obama, not the other Republican candidates. She doesn’t want to damage whomever actually is nominated to run against Obama.

There is some wisdom there.


15 posted on 01/17/2012 7:14:25 PM PST by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

Gingrich won the debates. Said the right things at the right questions. If Newt doesn’t win SoCar, we are all stuck with Mittsy.


16 posted on 01/17/2012 7:15:20 PM PST by max americana (Obama is a POS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Toespi

She didn’t endorse Newt! She even said so that it wasn’t a endorsement but it’s to keep the process going....(if Mitt wins S.C. most candidates are thinking about dropping out except for Paul)

That’s why Newt and Perry were making statements that they “may” stay in after S.C. If Mitt wins by a low plurality...she wants to stop the Mitt train but isn’t endorsing Newt


17 posted on 01/17/2012 7:23:58 PM PST by Bigtigermike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: max americana

Even Nancy Pelosi knows Romney supporters are banned on the most popular Conservative website, freerepublic.com

She mocked Romney today as she knows Conservatives will NEVER vote for him. That is a fact.


18 posted on 01/17/2012 7:24:25 PM PST by show
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

They haven’t figured out if Santorum wins IA,yet?
That would be a double whammy on Willard.


19 posted on 01/17/2012 7:24:25 PM PST by Leep (Paul/Vantura 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rick_Michael

Nope. I was for Palin and then Cain. I supported Bachmann for a brief period as well. I just explained what Establishment means. If you want to live in denial and believe that various candidates look out for you and are personal enemies amongst themselves, you are free to believe such nonsense.


20 posted on 01/17/2012 7:39:40 PM PST by JimWayne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson