Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tallguy
They don’t need the subs to take out the supertankers. Simple sea mines would be more cost effective. As such, best use of the Kilos might be as undersea minelayers. Sew a minefield across the strait & ‘declare the strait closed’.

We do have anti-mine capabilities, and we can use other sonar devices to detect such chokepoints. Tankers might move through their more slowly, waiting for an escort, but they'd still get through the strait.

35 posted on 01/18/2012 12:31:44 PM PST by Lou L (The Senate without a filibuster is just a 100-member version of the House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: Lou L

Agreed. And something else... most of those double-hulled supertankers would take a hit from a sea mine and simply shrug it off. During the 80’s tanker war the commander of the US Escort Group simply put the tankers in a single-file line behind the first tanker to hit a mine. All the US destroyers & frigates fell-in behind as well.


36 posted on 01/18/2012 12:38:52 PM PST by Tallguy (It's all 'Fun and Games' until somebody loses an eye!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: Lou L

... but what the Iranians are training to do this time is to perform “swarm attacks” using high-speed boats supported by heavier units. They will hit the convoys while they are picking their way through the minefields, making systematic minesweeping difficult.


39 posted on 01/18/2012 12:41:20 PM PST by Tallguy (It's all 'Fun and Games' until somebody loses an eye!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson