[MMaschin]

There are only three things that judge Malihi is concerned with in each case - 1) is Obama older than 35, 2) has he resided in the US for at least 14 years, and 3) is he a US natural born Citizen.

The judge isn't going to care about Obama's SSN, or whether or not the BC he has on his website is fraudulent - because it doesn't matter. Even if those things Orly is arguing about are true, being a felon does not make someone ineligble for the office of President. The only thing that does matter are the 3 points from the first paragraph. So, I completely ignore Orly's case.

When the judge denied the defenses Motion to Dismiss, he didn't wait for the plaintiffs response to the MOD first, he siad it was irrelavant, because he was denying the MOD. My previous post expresses fear that a similar thig could happen here - the defense does not provide proof of something, such as Obama's age, and the judge stops the hearing because he has enough information for his ruling. Thereby the issue of NBC, and Minor being precedent never comes up.

[Sgt_Schultze]

In that case, maybe somebody should forge another Obama BC, the information on which contradicts the official electronic version. An anonymous email could alert OT to the existence of the new BC and she could try to enter knowledge of its existence into the record. The defense would likely protest the new document as fraudulent. But how could they prove it without a physical examination?