Just a random thought here.
Perhaps the forger did the little smiley face and “X” to snare the DOH? Meaning, since the smiley face and “X” show without a doubt the thing is a forgery - over the top obvious - what to speak of all the other proof, the forger and accomplices now have the DOH over a barrel. The DOH never complained at the time, and are now therefore “partners in crime” up to their eyeballs. The DOH cannot now disavow any of it. They have to continue in the forgery crime spree. They’re chained to it.
Thanks for the ping, lj. I fall into the DL, KB camp on this one. I think what Obama released was a special ‘abstract’ prepared for him to reflect exactly what he wanted it to reflect. As such, it’s not a forgery per se, though it’s not even close to the original ‘birth record’.
HI’s fraud lies in not identifying it as such. Instead, they have actively tried to pass it off as an original BC. Now think about this. If you were going to release an abstract that differed wildly [due to adoption, etc.] from the original, ‘half-handwritten ‘birth-record’’, and yet you wanted to keep people from asking the fundamental question: ‘is this a copy of the original BC or an abstract of subsequent filings?’ - what would you do?
I submit you’d add a smiley face and other bizarre anomalies. That way people would focus on those and not on the obvious. I realize many disagree w me. That is how I see it, though, fwiw.
Thanks again for the ping. Things are definitely getting interesting!