Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet

” Whatever: this retrospective win (and it is a win, Iowa) gives Santorum a big claim to be the only man to actually beat Romney. It also means that we have to revise the history books. I’m not alone for having written that Mitt was unique in Republican history for winning Iowa and New Hampshire in a row....”

I swear the biggest reason I want Newt to win SC so these people can stop dry humping a 34 vote win in Iowa as being bigger than Jesus. They are almost as bad as the Paul-bots.


14 posted on 01/19/2012 9:13:24 AM PST by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: VanDeKoik

I’m gravitating to Newt, but you have to give Santorum credit for beating Milt in Iowa by spending $22,000 versus many millions.


21 posted on 01/19/2012 9:33:28 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (You can't invade the US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.~Admiral Yamamoto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: VanDeKoik
It also means that we have to revise the history books. I’m not alone for having written that Mitt was unique in Republican history for winning Iowa and New Hampshire in a row....”

That was always an example of press bogosity -- Ford won IA and NH in 76

48 posted on 01/19/2012 7:58:17 PM PST by Cowman (How can the IRS seize property without a warrant if the 4th amendment still stands?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson