“To learn very little about the case (and nothing about the cuplability of the primary War Criminal, Pickett) other then a weak diatribe against the honor of North Carolinians who fought for the USA, please see the cut-and-paste weak substitute for an argument in post 110 above.”
The “cut and paste” is from an article:
(Courtesy of Dr. Donald E. Collins; from a paper presented at the First Annual East Carolina University Civil War Symposium: “Eastern North Carolina in the Civil War”; October 11, 1996.)
[ Dr. Collins is currently working on two book-length histories of the First and Second North Carolina Union Regiments. ]
Makes me wonder what your credentials are.
Yes. That is the nature of 'cut-and paste', demonstrating no attempt by the 'cut-and-paster' to describe any analysis of the event and no even half-hearted attempt to somehow tie it to the fact of the issue, i.e., Picket's deliberate decision to murder POWs whom he knew had never worn the uniform of the CSA.
Makes me wonder what your credentials are.
In order to describe both Picket's crime and the inane character of Post 110, no credentials are required other than the ability to read, write, and comment with a sober mind.
It is not possible to imagine Lee committing an atrocity such as this.