Is their use of DeMint’s words from 2007 worse than Gingrich using Bachmann’s words from other contexts suggesting she is talking about Gingrich as a Presidential Candidate?
I would be upset if I endorsed someone in 2008, and people pretended I supported them now. Hey, wait, people do that to me all the time here — and yes, I do hate it.
You, Charles Wayne CT, a die-hard Romney supporter in 2008, part of a gang that regularly flat-out LIED about Romney "endorsements"!!! One of the claims you Romney sycophants made back then was that Michael Reagan endorsed Romney! So I went to Romney's own official campaign website, and indeed saw the endorsement -- identified as an official endorsement, touted there, words of nice praise from Michael Reagan, "Romney is (such and such, nice things)." Finding it hard to believe my eyes that Michael Reagan had actually officially thrown his support to Romney, I dug deeper and found the original column from which the quoted "endorsement" was lifted, and THE VERY NEXT SENTENCE following it was: "The same could be said for Rudy Giuliani."
Pretty obviously NOT intended by Michael Reagan as any kind of endorsement, let alone an official one, but deliberately misrepresented by Romney's people to be just that.
So PU-LEEEEEEZE, Charles Wayne, have a little self respect, for crying out loud!!! Oh, yes, I know you must be scandalized at such misrepresentation!
If it IS what Newt's doing, it bothers me, and I'm not afraid to say it. But for YOU of ALL PEOPLE to pretend to be outraged --
-- that's RICH.
Foxx, ping to my post 21. CWCT is a HOOT!
Here you are, still fighting in Romney’s behalf.