Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LibsRJerks

I don’t believe Palin actually endorsed Gingrich, she only said I would vote for him if I were allowed to vote in SC.

Newt has made some great debates, and he has scored big in them. I credit most of his rise in SC to those debates, and Newt.

Certainly a few voters may have come on board because of her statement, but I give more credit to Newt and the debates.


41 posted on 01/21/2012 5:02:39 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: Venturer

Newt was asked about Sarah`s semi endorsement, he stated that it was easy to see the impact, it was very real (paraphrasing from memory)


45 posted on 01/21/2012 5:22:44 AM PST by Friendofgeorge (SARAH PALIN 2012 OR FLIPPIN BUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: Venturer
You are right. She would have said Santorum if he had been running closer at the time..........the goal is to make the later primaries relevant. We don't want a TKO in the 3 round.

I bet tonight when Palin is giving her take she will make that clearer.

53 posted on 01/21/2012 7:04:16 AM PST by hawgwalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: Venturer

It was actually all of the above for myself and others I talked to. His debate skills plus her statement (which sounded like an endorsement to me). Until then a toss up between Santorum and Newt.


61 posted on 01/21/2012 7:51:54 AM PST by Down South P.E. (Be a Berean Acts 17:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: Venturer
I don’t believe Palin actually endorsed Gingrich, she only said I would vote for him if I were allowed to vote in SC.

Oh.

That is now cleared up!

66 posted on 01/21/2012 8:12:24 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: Venturer

Newt worries me a little because he’s a little incorrigible but that can be a good thing too. For sure his brilliance in speaking is our best shot at getting the independents to realize how far down the left hole Obama has taken us.

Seems to me Romney’s advantage is that he probably wouldn’t piss off the independents who want something more mild - and that’s Romney, mild.

Santorum bugs me for some reason. I just don’t think he’s ready, doesn’t have the gravitas - of course he’d be WAYY better than what we’ve got.

If I could pick the POTUS without interference from idiots I’d pick Sarah.


87 posted on 01/21/2012 4:04:57 PM PST by Aria ( "If we ever forget that we're one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson