Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Environmentalists see reason for alarm in GOP race
AP ^ | 2012-01-23 | MATT SEDENSKY

Posted on 01/23/2012 3:42:35 AM PST by cartan

WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. (AP)—Four years after the GOP’s rallying cry became “drill, baby, drill,” environmental issues have barely registered a blip in this Republican presidential primary.

That’s likely to change as the race turns to Florida.

The candidates’ positions on environmental regulation, global warming as well as clean air and water are all but certain to get attention ahead of the Jan. 31 primary in a state where the twin issues of offshore oil drilling and Everglades restoration are considered mandatory topics for discussion.

“It’s almost like eating fried cheese in Iowa,” said Jerry Karnas of the Everglades Foundation. Drilling has long been banned off Florida’s coasts because of fears that a spill would foul its beaches, wrecking the tourism industry, while the federal and state governments are spending billions to clean the Everglades.

Though most expect the candidates to express support for Everglades restoration—as Mitt Romney did in his 2008 campaign—environmentalists are noting a further rightward shift overall among the GOP field. The candidates have called for fewer environmental regulations, questioned whether global warming is a hoax and criticized the agency that implements and enforces clean air and water regulations.

“A cycle ago, there were people who actually believed in solving some of these problems,” said Navin Nayak of the League of Conservation Voters. “Now we’re faced with a slate that doesn’t even believe in basic science.”

(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.myway.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: environuts
I love the sound of squealing environuts in the morning…it’s so relaxing!
1 posted on 01/23/2012 3:42:38 AM PST by cartan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cartan

Environmental cases are mostly bad for the environment and chickens and things.


2 posted on 01/23/2012 3:46:46 AM PST by Leep (It's gonna be a Newt day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cartan
Environmentalists see reason for alarm in GOP race

I hope their alarm is justified.

3 posted on 01/23/2012 4:05:10 AM PST by BfloGuy (The final outcome of the credit expansion is general impoverishment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cartan
“A cycle ago, there were people who actually believed in solving some of these problems,” said Navin Nayak of the League of Conservation Voters. “Now we’re faced with a slate that doesn’t even believe in basic science.”
That knife cuts in two directions. The climate alarmists are mostly alarmed these days that the climate isn't cooperating with their view of how it should be behaving.

There is no significant warming, in deep contrast with what the alarmist models and theories predicted at this point. There isn't even a reason to believe that warming will worsen significantly for several decades, between predicted solar activity and the current oceanic climate oscillations.

If you happen to be concerned about too much CO2 being emitted, your best bet is inventing cost effective alternatives and letting the free market do its work. Nothing else that's been proposed is going to fly, in particular crippling the US economy further and letting China pass us by.

4 posted on 01/23/2012 4:26:44 AM PST by PreciousLiberty (Real Hope - Santorum '12!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PreciousLiberty
Also, when have climate models become “basic science,” rather than, well, models, which keep failing to predict anything that actually happens?
5 posted on 01/23/2012 4:41:22 AM PST by cartan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cartan
Environmentalists see reason for alarm in GOP race

There has never been a doubt as to who the environmental nuts would vote for. Obama didn't even have to stop the pipe line deal to get their votes. Does anybody here think they would vote republican, had he done otherwise?

It might have affected his money stream from them by a smidgen but that's all.

6 posted on 01/23/2012 4:56:43 AM PST by Graybeard58 (Eccl 10 v. 19 A feast is made for laughter, and wine maketh merry: but money answereth all things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cartan

When the unruly children do not get thier way in November they will become more mischievious.


7 posted on 01/23/2012 5:41:30 AM PST by ronnie raygun (V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cartan
“It’s almost like eating fried cheese in Iowa,” said Jerry Karnas of the Everglades Foundation.

Get stuffed, Jerry.

8 posted on 01/23/2012 5:41:56 AM PST by grobdriver (Proud Member, Party Of No! No Socialism - No Fascism - Nobama - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BfloGuy
I hope their alarm is justified.

I see no reason why this alliance of convenience between crony capitalists, envirowackos and the US government should not continue. They invest in green jobs, which the envirowhackos and faux-envirowackos (Gore) cheer on (the latter for a cut on the deal washed through influential law firms), get a hoard of government bureaucrats hired to handle the bad paper to negotiate the deal between the repacious investors and the rapacious investment banks (who will stuff the bad paper into pension funds), said bureaucrats working hard to get terms favorable to the US citizenrgy (wink wink). Everyone wins except the tax payer and who ever cared about him.

9 posted on 01/23/2012 5:49:34 AM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

So, is 0bama such an “environmentalist” {ie, COMMUNIST} ideologue that he shut down the pipeline out of principle instead of as a political pander to Gang Green?

If he had their vote anyway, then there was no need to stop it. I wonder if their vote is that secure. They won’t vote for a non/anti-communist, but they might stay home.


10 posted on 01/23/2012 5:52:31 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cartan

What’s missing for the eco-fascist movement are visible signs of swastikas and jackboots.

So-called envirnomentlists are the putrid spawn of Hitler’s fascist movement.


11 posted on 01/23/2012 7:22:37 AM PST by sergeantdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson