Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

...but not our grand-daughters and grand-sons...
1 posted on 01/23/2012 10:09:26 AM PST by Sopater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: Sopater


22 posted on 01/23/2012 10:27:49 AM PST by Iron Munro ("Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight he'll just kill you." John Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sopater

we should teach our daughters that killing their own offspring will give them the “same chance” as our sons?

Liberal logic....it never makes sense


23 posted on 01/23/2012 10:28:19 AM PST by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sopater

Bingo. This man is a monster. He is so in love with the death of the unborn that he is blind to the damage that abortion does to our daughters and sons. Not everyone’s conscience is so seared that they can kill a baby and just walk away to a great future.

How can anyone celebrate Roe v Wade? Even the most callous human being should mark the day with a sense of mourning.

Thank God He is merciful. There is forgiveness available to those who abort babies and those who advocate the same. However, the champions of abortion are dangling from a very fragile thread over the fires of hell. God will not forbear forever.


25 posted on 01/23/2012 10:29:15 AM PST by Truth is a Weapon (Truth, it hurts so good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sopater

-—to recognize the “fundamental constitutional right” to abortion and to “continue our efforts to ensure that our daughters have the same rights, freedoms, and opportunities as our sons to fulfill their dreams.”-—

Its too bad that Stanley Ann Dunham didn’t have the opportunities to fulfill her dreams by exercising her constitutional right. The poor young woman had to give birth to her bastard child and moved to Indonesia in shame.


26 posted on 01/23/2012 10:29:19 AM PST by running_dog_lackey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sopater

who was that dumbass who voted no on Obamacare until Obam promised him abortions would not be covered?

That shitforbrains should be the FIRST to demand it be overturned

was it Bart Stupak (or something like that?)


29 posted on 01/23/2012 10:33:10 AM PST by Mr. K (Physically unable to profreed <--- oops, see?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sopater
Obama said. “I remain committed to protecting a woman’s right to choose

"Choose" what, Barry?

Huh?

Are you afraid of the "A" word?

You're "protecting" a specious "right" to commit abortion. To kill a baby, and do so in any of several particularly grotesque ways.

It has become obvious that the highest values of the democRat party are sodomy and killing babies.

30 posted on 01/23/2012 10:35:19 AM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sopater
From an article up at Drudge regarding RAND delay by TSA this morning.

...Paul was scheduled to speak to the March for Life today in Washington D.C., an annual rally by anti-abortion rights activists held on the anniversary of the Supreme Court ruling Roe w. Wade. It looks like that won't happen.

31 posted on 01/23/2012 10:36:33 AM PST by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sopater

The best way for women to avoid abortion is to keep their legs closed.


32 posted on 01/23/2012 10:39:15 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sopater

The tyranny of the extrouterine over the introuterine.

“Die so that me and mine can have more!”


33 posted on 01/23/2012 10:41:05 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sopater

On the bright side, this will ensure no more Obamas.


34 posted on 01/23/2012 10:43:36 AM PST by AmusedBystander (The philosophy of the school room in one generation will be the philosophy of government in the next)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sopater
The same chance to recklessly engage in sex with no consequence or responsibility for the outcome? THAT "same chance"?

The 75% of the babies born without fathers named, would become even HIGHER, if we don't let them kill the children in the womb, is what he is defending....why not add a "DNA rider", to determine paternity, and have the fathers held responsible for the COST of raising a child, AND, for the cost of killing his child in the womb?

No father identification=no added handouts for the children from the welfare boards....period.

35 posted on 01/23/2012 10:43:57 AM PST by traditional1 (Free speech for me.....not for thee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sopater

Sons fulfill their dreams by killing their children?

This is one depraved, lost soul.


36 posted on 01/23/2012 10:44:58 AM PST by St_Thomas_Aquinas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sopater

I wasn’t aware we allow males to either abort or to protect a woman’s pregnancy. I wasn’t aware males are even part of the issue here. But Obama needs to pit people against one another on every issue.


38 posted on 01/23/2012 10:53:18 AM PST by Williams (Honey Badger Don't Care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sopater

You wanna fulfill your dreams?

Don’t have unprotected sex!

Don’t have sex at all if you are a teenager!


41 posted on 01/23/2012 10:59:28 AM PST by POWERSBOOTHEFAN (Future Meteorologist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sopater

I’ve always found abortion to abhorrent, but somehow I wonder why Stanley didn’t have one ...


43 posted on 01/23/2012 11:16:13 AM PST by The Sons of Liberty (Psalm 109:8 Let his days be few and let another take his office. - Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sopater
I wonder if the SOB ever thought about what if Stanley Ann had exercised her right to choose (I know it was before Roe v Wade).

To "celebrate" this most evil and hideous SC ruling is nothing short of pure evil.

46 posted on 01/23/2012 11:25:12 AM PST by Marathoner ("Government is not reason. Government is not eloquence. It is force." George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sopater

“...continue our efforts to ensure that our daughters have the same rights, freedoms, and opportunities as our sons to fulfill their dreams.”

Well, taken to its logical conclusion, does this mean Obama wants to also help the biological father of the fetus to force an abortion as child support might keep the sperm donor from buying those hot new Jordan Reeboks? Either way it is termination of an unborn life and should not be done for selfish or immoral reasons.


48 posted on 01/23/2012 11:45:48 AM PST by RicocheT (Eat the rich only if you're certain it's your last meal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sopater

Our sons don’t have any right (yet) to kill their children.


50 posted on 01/23/2012 11:57:31 AM PST by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sopater

If our daughters are not responsible enough to keep from getting pregnant and instead opt for murder, they have not deserved a chance.


51 posted on 01/23/2012 11:58:47 AM PST by formosa (Formosa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sopater
"government should not intrude on private family matters"

Like faggots and dykes interference, you mean?

Like forcing me to pay for someone else's lifestyle choices, such as baby-killing, drug-using, education for illegals, where it takes food off MY table from MY family, so you can buy votes?

How about vote fraud, that affects MY family because my vote is offset by an illegal one, and I can't thereby vote for MY FAMILY's best interest, because YOU want to dictate our lives?

52 posted on 01/23/2012 12:13:51 PM PST by traditional1 (Free speech for me.....not for thee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson