Posted on 01/23/2012 6:46:48 PM PST by Daffynition
Santorum’s failing, IMHO, is his inability to be truly spontaneous. training as a lawyer has it down side. He has a hard time breaking away from his brief. He had a chance last night. Terry Schiavo wasn’t a legal case: she was poor woman whose husband wanted her dead, and refused to let her parents take over her care. So she was starved to death.
Santorum’s failing, IMHO, is his inability to be truly spontaneous. training as a lawyer has it down side. He has a hard time breaking away from his brief. He had a chance last night. Terry Schiavo wasn’t a legal case: she was poor woman whose husband wanted her dead, and refused to let her parents take over her care. So she was starved to death.
I think you would enjoy looking at this book:Robert Greene - The 48 Laws of Power. A fascinating lessons in how power brokers operate, in historical perspectives.
That would be fun
Out of the blue, quite a while ago, I had a dream that was ever so clear that Hannity was the President, coming off from Air Force One. I could tell by his demeanor that he was doing a great job.
Hannity was the only one notable that constantly went for Obama's juggler vein before the election concerning his extremely bad connections. He was and still is like a pit bull who won't let the issue go. Nobody else was hardly breathing a word about the real Obama but Hannity and that's not a small thing.
Well, OK, technically “Lucifer,” actually.
Seems pretty obvious to me that underneath, secretly, most of them are Satan worshipers.
It would be interesting to secretly follow some of them on important Satan worshiping nights and see where they go and what they do. It wouldn’t be surprising at all if it was to participate in Satan worshiping rituals. The unmistakable, telltale odor of brimstone lingers around many of them.
Hannity’s gotten pretty weak in the last couple of years; it’s almost painful to listen to him.
And he wasn’t the only one going after “the real Obama” - not by a long shot.
Insofar as both politician and scientist would have me conform to their respective soapboxes and hoaxes; the latter willing to create the hoax in the interest of favorable disbursements from the former - both are tainted beyond use these days.
But if Obama was able to win last time in spite of Jeremiah Wright and Bill Ayers and Alinsky and his Barack Sr, what makes Newt think those are winning issues this time?
Are you including me (a scientist who has examined the evidence and is convinced that AGW is not only bovinefeces, but is not remotely similar to “real science”) — in your blanket condemnation of “scientists”?
The qualifying word: “insofar.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.