[presently no screen name]

I think your underlying question is who I oppose.

WHAT? I say what I mean and mean what I say. I have NO underlying question.

YOU: not to attack our alternative conservative candidates.

ME: Who did you have in mind? Who are they?

All you had to do is give me the names - that's all I asked for! And you spin that into I have an underlying question and I want to know who you oppose! AMAZING!!!!

To be crystal clear,

And being crystal clear - you STILL didn't give me the names and that's ALL I asked for. This reminds me of Mitt debating - lots of junk and no answer to a very simple question.

[darrellmaurina]

@ 195: I don't know why you keep asking. I've given you the names at least three separate times that I'm willing to support.

Santorum and Gingrich. In that order — at least for now.

I don't see how I could be clearer than that.

If you'd asked me not too long ago, I would have added Perry to that list as another acceptable alternate candidate to Gingrich, but he's no longer an option by his own choice.