Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

Mark spent a while on it

In essence he said that the ethics charges should never have been bought against Newt in the first place..

he explained that all of the charges were frivolous but they had to work on each one..

Mark got to read all the documents..

As you know Mark is fair and extremely intelligent...

a practicing attorney..

so he knows what he is talking about..

I think it was during the 2nd hour 7-8PM

I was listening online and I closed out the radio page shortly after 8 because the debate was coming up..

You should go to his website and listen to that piece for yourself..


92 posted on 01/24/2012 8:17:51 AM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: Tennessee Nana

Mark said most of the ethics charges were filed by a far-left Democrat, maybe John Conyers. Mark said Newt was advised to pay the $300,000, I think because it would have cost more to continue defending against the charges.

We saw the exact same thing played out with Sarah Palin, when she had to resign as governor because she couldn’t afford to defend herself from frivolous ethics charges. Newt might want to mention the comparison.


102 posted on 01/24/2012 8:59:45 AM PST by JediJones (Newt-er Romney in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: Tennessee Nana

thanks, TN.


106 posted on 01/24/2012 9:08:22 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Pray Continued Victory for our Troops Still in Afghan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson